My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2011_0509
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
CC_Minutes_2011_0509
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2011 12:57:33 PM
Creation date
5/24/2011 12:57:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/9/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,May 09,2011 <br /> Page 33 <br /> tinued representation on the DAB by the City Manager or his designee; allowing <br /> the DAB to make decisions on representation, under the auspices of the NSCF, <br /> whose advisory board it was; industry standards in charging administrative fees of <br /> up to 3% identified by the City upon the Foundation's creation, but that had never <br /> been implemented by the Foundation and was not a future intent; and current <br /> magnitude of the fund estimated at$700,000. <br /> Ms. Pust noted that make up of the Foundation was drawn from various organiza- <br /> tions, including youth athletic organizations, serving this community, and had <br /> been eventually a compromise composition after much debate. <br /> Johnson moved that the NSCF name be duly reflected in the City's ordinance. <br /> After further discussion, it was the consensus to bring back the agreement and or- <br /> dinance at a future meeting. <br /> Ms. Pust recognized the due diligence of Mr. Zibell in investing the funds, mak- <br /> ing the organization able to withstand the latest economic downturn. Ms. Pust <br /> advised that a law had now been adopted that would prevent speculative investing <br /> and advised that the Foundation would be returning in the future with a resolution <br /> to that effect for City Council action in recognizing this new legislation. <br /> Other Gambling Issues <br /> Ms. Pust advised that there were numerous legal revisions needed in the City's <br /> ordinance due to the repeal of many referenced State Statutes; however, she de- <br /> ferred to the City Attorney to make those revisions and recommendations to the <br /> City Council. <br /> Councilmember Johnson opined, for the public record, that outside gambling <br /> foundations seeking to manage gambling sites in Roseville be prevented form <br /> doing so. Councilmember Johnson noted that the current ordinance is prohibitive <br /> for existing gambling organizations in Roseville to have more than one site, addi- <br /> tional investigation had been done to determine if other non profits were interest- <br /> ed in sponsoring or hosting another license. In short, Councilmember Johnson <br /> advised that Finance Director Miller had sent out a letter to those gambling asso- <br /> ciation licensees to seek their interest in carrying a second license, with only two <br /> (2) affirmative responses: B-Dale Club and North Suburban. Councilmember <br /> Johnson noted that Roger Toogood of the RCL had also sought input within the <br /> community of other non profits that may be interested in hosting a license; with <br /> no responses to-date. Councilmember Johnson noted that the RCL endorsed <br /> Roseville-based organizations hosting up to two (2) sites at this time. <br /> Councilmember Johnson suggested several things for the City Attorney to add, <br /> including language prohibiting non-Roseville gambling associations taking part in <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.