My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2011_0516
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
CC_Minutes_2011_0516
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/27/2011 1:17:13 PM
Creation date
5/27/2011 1:17:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/16/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,May 16, 2011 <br /> Page 10 <br /> and actual violations in the community were minimal, it was important to keep <br /> kids alcohol free, and that started as adults being role models individually and as a <br /> community in setting high standards. In the City's efforts to make things more <br /> fair between on and off-sale businesses, Ms. Mosby spoke in support of making <br /> on-sale more restrictive. <br /> Steve Burwell, 2482 Albert Street; Owner of Fairview Wines and Spirits <br /> Mr. Burwell noted that, when talking about a two-tiered system in Roseville, two <br /> different types of businesses were being discussed; with on-sale selling drinks on <br /> their premises; and off-sale patrons taking the product off-site. Mr. Burwell noted <br /> the restrictions on the number of off-sale establishments per City Code as well as <br /> the additional merchandise off-sales could sell based on State Statute; but the lack <br /> of any of those restrictions for on-sale establishments in Roseville. Mr. Burwell <br /> opined that the current ordinance was not a fair system for off-sale establish- <br /> ments, based on the suspensions provisions; and from his perspective, opined that <br /> not enough discussion or thought had gone into the current ordinance. Mr. Bur- <br /> well noted that he had been furious when he left the meeting in February of 2010 <br /> when the current ordinance was adopted and how the decision had been made; <br /> with little or no input from the perspective of liquor store or bar owners, bur ra- <br /> ther based only on individual City Councilmember perspectives. <br /> Mr. Burwell referenced recent postings on the Roseville Issues Forum (RIF) and <br /> the need for more discussion. Mr. Burwell addressed the business practices of his <br /> establishment, as well as those other responsible off-sale establishments in the <br /> community, clarifying that they took their responsibilities seriously, and did not <br /> intentionally sell to underage individuals or inebriated individuals, and used due <br /> diligence to ensure that. Mr. Burwell opined that as a long-time resident, and <br /> business owner, in the community, he and other business owners had a right to <br /> expect more than a fifteen (15) minutes discussion that seriously impacted their <br /> livelihoods, with other people making decisions impacting that livelihood. Mr. <br /> Burwell noted his desire, as well as that of other business owners, in protecting <br /> children; and his personal abhorrence for underage consumption and drunk driv- <br /> ing. <br /> Before a decision is made on whether or not to reduce fines for off-sale estab- <br /> lishments, Mr. Burwell asked that a serious discussion be held by the City Coun- <br /> cil and its licensees, both on and off-sale; rather than the continual push to make <br /> liquor licensees solve social issues for the community. Mr. Burwell guaranteed <br /> the City Council that minors were not buying alcohol from his establishment. <br /> John Kysylyczyn,3083 N Victoria Street <br /> Mr. Kysylyczyn noted the ten (10) months of City Councilmember time that went <br /> into this issue in 2000 in reviewing alcohol laws and enacting a new structure and <br /> new way of doing business. However, Mr. Kysylyczyn opined that the further <br /> amendments made last year were a bad decision, lacking further thought and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.