CC_Minutes_2011_0516 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,May 16,2011 Page 18 subdivisions triggered by pulling a Building Permit that would require topography maps, where the water is currently going and where it is proposed to go tomor- row; and determining any hardships or drainage that may be directed to adjacent property owners, as part of the overall engineering review. At the request of Mayor Roe, Ms. Bloom further clarified that there could be no increased runoff to adjacent properties. Councilmember McGehee noted her discussions with City Engineer Bloom and Community Development Director Trudgeon related to this issue and Mr. Bo- ryczka's concerns; noting that they had advised that the City Council could condi- tion their approval and tie any subdivision approval to that condition. Council- member McGehee supported deferring action if this did not satisfy the concerns, to direct Planning staff to make the requirements tighter. At the request of Mayor Roe, Ms. Bloom advised that the City could include a stormwater management condition as suggested, similar to that done for the 3053 Chatsworth application, with approval contingent upon staff approval of a storm- water management plan, with the application then coming back before the City Council as a Consent Agenda Item at a future meeting for finalization. Mayor Roe opened the Public Hearing at 8:48 p.m. for the purpose of hearing public comment on the request for approval of a MINOR SUBDIVISION creating one (1) additional residential parcel at 2220 Acorn Road(PF 11-006). Public Comment Vivian Ramalingen,2182 Acorn Road Ms. Ramalingen advised that she had been unaware of Mr. Boryczka's comments until tonight's meeting, and asked for a better explanation for runoff issues; and a better understanding of where the future residential structure would be located. Merlyn Scroggins,2237 Acorn Road Once staffs presentation and map display clarified the location of the subdivision, Mr. Scroggins spoke in support of the request, opining that a private property owner could do as they wished with their property; and further opined that this looked like a proper way to divide the property. Gary Boryczka,2250 Acorn Road Mr. Boryczka expounded on his written comments provided as a bench handout; and expressed the additional negative impacts to his property adjoining Mr. Jungmann's property on the north. Mr. Boryczka advised that he wasn't con- cerned about splitting the lot, but only sought to correct drainage problems that had taken place and been exacerbated over the last fifty (50) years. Mr. Boryczka opined that the property abstract and easements should be adhered to, with no storm water drainage altered through manmade means that would no longer nega-