My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2011_0516
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
CC_Minutes_2011_0516
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/27/2011 1:17:13 PM
Creation date
5/27/2011 1:17:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/16/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,May 16,2011 <br /> Page 6 <br /> Mr. Eichten reviewed the Auditor's Role; providing an opinion on financial <br /> statements; testing of internal controls and compliance; and federal award pro- <br /> gram audit tested this year. Mr. Eichten advised that the audit report was orga- <br /> nized in sections: Audit Summary; Funding Cities in MN; Government Funds <br /> Overview; Financial Trends and Conditions of Selected Funds; and accounting <br /> and Auditing Updates, with each section addressed in more detail in the above- <br /> referenced reports and documents. <br /> Management Report <br /> Mr. Eichten noted three (3) findings during the audit on the City's compliance <br /> with federal laws and regulations, as detailed on page 1 of the Management Re- <br /> port's Audit Summary; and City management staff's response to each of those <br /> findings. <br /> Discussion included how tracking systems can be integrated into the City's ac- <br /> counting system in the future; and correction of findings through documented res- <br /> ponses or elimination of those findings to address future funding requirements. <br /> Mr. Eichten advised that his firm did a lot of municipal audits, and due to current <br /> budget constraints, those local governments were all receiving more federal aid <br /> and receiving subsequent audit findings similar to the City of Roseville; and <br /> opined that these type of findings were not unusual when put in their proper pers- <br /> pective. <br /> MN Legal Compliance Audit Findings <br /> Mr. Eichten noted four(4) findings during the audit on the City's compliance with <br /> Minnesota laws and regulations, as detailed on page 2 of the Management Re- <br /> port's Audit Summary and City management staff's response to each of those <br /> findings. <br /> Discussion included only two (2) out of forty (40) tested invoices being delin- <br /> quent slightly over the thirty-five (35) day terms; needed legislation to bring the <br /> state law up to current electronic payment standards for the requirement to obtain <br /> required claims declarations from vendors on electronic fund transfer payments. <br /> Finance Director Miller advised that the City had received a similar finding in its <br /> previous audit; and due to the cumbersome compliance burden and expense for <br /> the City as well as its smaller vendors, management staff had chosen to take this <br /> audit hit for a number of years as the lesser of two evils. <br /> Mr. Eichten concurred that it was an onerous task for a City to track every time <br /> they sent out an electronic payment. <br /> Mr. Miller noted that this only impacted smaller vendors, many of whom were not <br /> equipped to do so, putting the onus back on the City to call them to verify their <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.