My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2011_0613
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
CC_Minutes_2011_0613
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2011 9:45:19 AM
Creation date
6/21/2011 9:45:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/13/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,June 13,2011 <br /> Page 25 <br /> Further discussion included clarifying that the levy would remain at the current <br /> level at $300,000, but spent on capital needs, not operational needs; $750,000 <br /> from reserves to endow the equipment replacement fund, coming from the one- <br /> time tax increment financing (TIF) repayment of approximately $1.2 million last <br /> year as a result of closing out the Center Pointe TIF District, with $236,000 used <br /> in 2011 for capital equipment and the rest in reserves; clarifying that the 3.4% <br /> levy increase would be the base to remain level for capital needs; with the sub- <br /> committee seeking input from the public and the remainder of the City Council on <br /> these recommendations to-date. <br /> Councilmember McGehee requested that the policy of setting aside a specific <br /> amount during each budget cycle (annually) as a method of continuing to ade- <br /> quately fund the CIP Budget be written and approved by the Council. This would <br /> enable and encourage future Councils to continue this policy so that Roseville can <br /> avoid this situation of underfunding in subsequent years." <br /> Mayor Roe clarified that this report is the first draft of such a policy. <br /> Councilmember Johnson concurred, noting that there would be additional recom- <br /> mendations to follow. <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that this was only a miniscule part of the prob- <br /> lem; and while talking about taxes, the City needed to give serious consideration <br /> to looking at the City's tax capacity as it developed to alleviate the tax burden on <br /> residents. Councilmember McGehee referenced personal conversations she'd had <br /> with City Manager Malinen and Community Development Director Trudgeon; <br /> and their interest in developing tools, such as the possible creation of an Econom- <br /> ic Development Commission, to provide reports on economic costs/benefits of <br /> particular developments or programs. <br /> Mayor Roe clarified that this preliminary report is for information purposes only, <br /> and no formal action was requested at this time,but that subsequent actions would <br /> follow as part of the budget process; and may include a policy resolution for <br /> adoption after further consideration. <br /> City Manager Malinen encouraged that any questions or concerns about this ap- <br /> proach be provided to the subcommittee; however, he acknowledged that there <br /> appeared to be a general consensus in support. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that, in reviewing the budget calendar and process, there would <br /> be several opportunities for public comment once the City Council received the <br /> City Manager-recommended budget for 2012/2013 on July 11, 2011; including <br /> their input on capital needs funding. <br /> b. Continue Discussions on a Preliminary 2012 Tax Levy <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.