Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, June 13, 2011 <br />Page 11 <br />cient root space; noting that the Commission saw some great examples on struc- <br />tural soils during the Neprash presentation. <br />Member Stenlund opined that expense was relative for some of the new technolo- <br />gies for storm water management, since ponds and other storm water management <br />options cost money to construct, maintain and reconstruct as well. <br />Member Stenlund noted the advantages in the PWET Commission being able to <br />provide input for new developments, such as the Josephine Woods plat, and op- <br />portunities to blend homes into existing topography in order to save trees rather <br />than replace them. <br />Chair DeBenedet reviewed potential 2011/12 PWET Commission Topics and a <br />proposed work plan; and reviewed the status of the various items as detailed in the <br />RCA. Chair DeBenedet noted the PWET Commission's interest in meeting joint- <br />ly with the City's Parks and Recreation Commission in reviewing pathway plan- <br />ning/implementation, incorporating the Imagine Roseville 2025 and Comprehen- <br />sive Plan update, and discussing them from a Public Works and Parks perspective. <br />Councilmember Willmus noted the need to incorporate the Parks and Recreation <br />Master Plan process. <br />Member Gjerdingen noted the need to review the Parks and Recreation constella- <br />tions and how to tie them together with the Pathway Master Plan. <br />Chair DeBenedet noted the Commission's interest in pursuing community volun- <br />teers to implement projects or initiatives; with Member Stenlund suggesting lake- <br />shore stabilization projects as an example and one with which he was familiar <br />based on past Eagle Scout projects. Chair DeBenedet concurred, noting that <br />many low impact storm water and erosion control projects needed people, not <br />heavy equipment. <br />Related to the PWET Commission's conservation review of stormwater manage- <br />ment practices, Mayor Roe asked that, as part of that study, the Commission con- <br />sider ways to incent certain types of approaches in the overall regulating scheme, <br />such as demonstration ideas needing to be evolved. <br />Councilmember McGehee expressed her favorable impression with the Josephine <br />Woods development project, and complimented the Commission if they had any <br />input in that project. Councilmember McGehee expressed her interest in a pres- <br />entation at the City Council level on the Helsinki and Stockholm tree options. <br />Councilmember Johnson expressed his appreciation of the Commission's discus- <br />sion on asset management; and tied that into the current work of the CIP Task <br />Force and budget concerns, specifically the funding deficit over the next 10 2 0 <br />