My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-06-28_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2011
>
2011-06-28_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2011 9:08:16 AM
Creation date
6/28/2011 8:53:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/28/2011
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, June 13, 2011 <br />Page 12 <br />years. Councilmember Johnson noted that a lot had to do with the City Council's <br />strategy from a business standpoint in managing that deficit. Councilmember <br />Johnson advised that input from the Commission on items such as whether the <br />current practice for paving streets needed to be continued, or if dropping down a <br />level or deferring that reconstruction was financially advantageous or would have <br />a downside and the current schedule continued. Councilmember Johnson re- <br />quested that type of study by the Commission to help the City Council get a better <br />handle on practical cuts or overall, long -term cost savings by more frequent re- <br />construction and /or maintenance; or where assets were maximized out. In dealing <br />with the CIP assets, Councilmember Johnson advised that there was nothing on <br />their list that didn't somehow involve the PWET Commission; and welcomed in- <br />put from and a close working relationship with the Commission to maximize the <br />CIP Plan and make a bold effort to get that back on track. <br />Mayor Roe spoke in support of the track being undertaken by the Commission on <br />asset management techniques and from a CIP perspective, how to manage streets <br />and other City infrastructure; in addition to review of the current Assessment Pol- <br />icy. <br />Councilmember Willmus echoed comments of his colleagues; and supported the <br />work that the Commission was undertaking for organized solid waste collection <br />and determining the real impacts, and other studies that will provide guidance to <br />the City. Councilmember Willmus advised that he looked forward to hearing the <br />PWET Commission discussion and their future recommendations. <br />Councilmember Pust opined that any members of the public listening to this dis- <br />cussion, would be impressed with the level of review performed by the PWET <br />Commission, and asked the Chair for their meeting schedule for public informa- <br />tion. <br />Chair DeBenedet noted that the PWET Commission met the fourth Tuesday of <br />each month in the City Hall Council chambers at 6:30 p.m. <br />Mayor Roe noted tonight's discussion as an example of the rationale for and value <br />of volunteer advisory commissions to assist the City Council; and expressed his <br />personal appreciation for their time and input. Mayor Roe reiterated that those <br />items listed by the PWET Commission as topics for their 2011/2012 work plan <br />were right on track and in line with the City Council's own work plan and areas of <br />concern. <br />At the request of Member Stenlund on anything else on the City Council's radar <br />that the PWET Commission should be aware of, Mayor Roe opined that the <br />Neighborhood Traffic Management Policy review was a very high priority. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.