My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-06-28_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2011
>
2011-06-28_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2011 9:08:16 AM
Creation date
6/28/2011 8:53:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/28/2011
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Bloom reviewed individual Commissioner comments that had been <br />incorporated and how to interpret the relined version based on that feedback; and <br />noted that the fees would be included with other City fines and fees that were <br />reviewed annually for any amendments based on actual costs and staff time. <br />Ms. Bloom noted that this was the first step, followed by the Storm water <br />Drainage Ordinance in the near future, with an Illicit Discharge Ordinance and <br />other related ordinances to follow. Ms. Bloom further noted that non compliance, <br />implementation and maintenance issues would be addressed upon receipt of best <br />management practices (BMP) information pending from the Ramsey <br />Conservation District. <br />Member Stenlund arrived at this time, approximately 7:03 p.m. <br />Discussion included identifying and differentiating construction versus post <br />construction control provisions in place for failure to comply and their <br />consistency and /or overlap with other sections and areas of administrative <br />enforcement; whether those costs could be assessed if reimbursement was not <br />received; and ability to enforce action if failure to do corrective work. <br />Ms. Bloom advised that the sections mentioned would be further reviewed by <br />staff and a clean copy would be presented to the City Attorney for review and <br />comment. Members expressed their interest in receiving a clean copy of the <br />document when available. <br />Member Vanderwall moved, Member Gjerdingen seconded, recommendation to <br />the City Council of the Erosion Control Ordinance as presented; pending final <br />review by staff and the City Attorney. <br />Ayes: 5 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />6. Discussion of Joint City Council PWET Commission Meeting Topics <br />Mr. Schwartz led Members in a review of topics discussed in 2010, and potential <br />2011 topics for discussion with the City Council at the annual joint meeting with <br />the PWET Commission, scheduled for Monday, June 13, 2011; as detailed in the <br />staff report dated May 24, 2011. Mr. Schwartz noted that, in addition to those <br />items, the PWET Commission's review and recommendation of a Neighborhood <br />Traffic Management Policy would be a large undertaking over the next few <br />months. <br />Member Felice noted she had a scheduling conflict and would be unavailable to <br />attend the joint meeting. <br />Page 4 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.