Laserfiche WebLink
<br />smaller line that goes from the main sewer back to the property <br />line of the structure involved. Routinely, that would only be <br />a very short line because the homes routinely come up to the <br />street. In this particular case, since we have a parcel that <br />is in the rear, the method of getting to that home would be to <br />construct a long service, about 160 feet long, back to that <br />property line. When we had contacted a representative of the <br />owner, he also requested that since we would be doing this <br />work, that the City consider bringing a water line to the <br />property at the same time and under the same construction. It <br />would be far cheaper to do both of these actions simultaneously. <br />In doing this work, it would be necessary to go along the <br />driveway that serves the front lot and that would essentially <br />be totally reconstructed as part of the project because of <br />this construction. The owner of the ~ome, according to our <br />information, is an elderly lady and at the time the project <br />was completed, if it's passed, and the assessment hearings <br />were conducted, it would appear that the owner would be eli- <br />gible to apply for the senior citizen's deferment, should they <br />wish to make that decision. I will have Mr. Popovich review <br />some of the financial details. <br /> <br />MR. POPOVICH: Mayor and members of the Council, this <br />project was published at a total cost of $5,622.00. The <br />sanitary sewer cost is $4,125.92 and the water service is <br />$1,495.99. The City pOlicy is to assess property owners for <br />100% for this ~ype of service and that's the recommendation <br />here. The engineer has indicated that the property has not <br />been assessed for t0e trunk sewer in the area yet. That cost <br />will have to be ascertained and that could be added to it as <br />well. That would be the total cost and obviously, if the <br />person meets with the requirements of your policy on deferred <br />assessments, it could be deferred. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: The water line also has some outstanding <br />assessments. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: Are there any written statements? <br /> <br />MR. ANDRE: There are none. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: I will open this hearing to the public and <br />ask that each speaker identify him or herself and the address <br />of the property to which you're referring. Are there any <br />statements on 1856 Lexington? Any statements? There being <br />none, I will close the hearing. <br /> <br />Councilman Johnson then i~troduced the following resolu- <br /> <br />tion and moved its adoption: <br /> <br />2 <br />