Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MAYOR DEMOS: I guess I do not feel that $9,314.00 is <br />excessive, by any means. As Charlie said, a lift station would <br />be required and we only assess one-half. So that's a little <br />over $9,000 and there's a minimum of three, if not five lots <br />there. I don't really feel that that's an excessive amount. <br />It sounds big at first but it really isn't. I've been told <br />that there's open sewage running there and I think going down <br />into the wetlands there that we have an obligation to protect <br />that. <br /> <br />MR. ANDRE: There's certainly the potential of serving <br />at least four lots. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN FRANKE: Didn't they petition for this? <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: Most of these have been over a period of <br />years, we've dialogued with the owners back and forth and as <br />they look at various alternatives and options - one of the <br />options they certainly wanted to explore was going through a <br />village improvement, such as this. That's why they petitioned <br />for it. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN JOHNSON: If you're going to improve property <br />and set it out for three or four lots, it seems to me that <br />Alternative I would be the one that's most suitable because it <br />provides the sewer (inaudible). If, on the other hand, it's <br />going to be some period of time before that's done, maybe <br />Alternative II would be more - I don't know whether Alternative <br />II, by the time you hook up to it, whether it would be less <br />costly or more costly. <br /> <br />CEDRIC ADAMS: I think from our point it would be far <br />more and the fact that that one parcel there - I don't know why, <br />but we are now being assessed as having sewer to it, which we <br />don't have now. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN JOHNSON: Alternative I looks more practical <br />in terms of serving the whole property but it seems to me, if <br />. you were not going to build on all those lots and if you could <br />hook up to Alternative II, that might be the less expensive <br />way for you to go as sort of a temporary (inaudible) a pretty <br />costly one at $7,000 without really accommodating the other <br />lots. <br /> <br />CEDRIC ADAMS: I have to agree - option I is the best way, <br />as far as looking at it now. I don't know what Reiling has <br />planned for his property. I imagine some time in the future <br />he's going to be extending a line into his property and whether <br />at that time we can connect to his sewer to develop further'on, <br />that's a question that is open. I don't know. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN JOHNSON: If you could get Mr. Reiling to <br />develop that piece of property we might be able to work with <br />him. <br /> <br />c. <br />