Laserfiche WebLink
<br />steep driveways. We propose the same type of action here - that <br />is, to raise the roadway grades slightly at the steep driveways <br />to provide them with a little flatter driveway condition. <br /> <br />The proposed new street construction is again the City <br />standard seven ton residential street, concrete curbs and gutters <br />on both sides of the road, with the faces 32 feet apart and with <br />an asphaltic concrete surface. The new roadway grades will <br />again closely match the existing grades of the driveways except <br />for tho'se couple steep driveways we talked about previously. <br />There are trees and shrubs on both sides of the roadway and <br />while the trees are set quite a way back from the edge of the <br />street, there are, in a couple of locations, some shrubs that <br />are just a few feet off the asphalt today. We've taken a look <br />at those and it looks like with a little trimming they could be <br />transplanted further back into the yards. That is our proposed <br />action for those. There are also a couple of drainage swales. <br />I'm not certain as to between which houses they come, but we <br />have been careful to look at the top of the curb elevations to <br />make sure that the drainage through those swales can still get <br />out in the street. <br /> <br />Again on this street we have some corner lots, which we <br />talked about in previous hearings. We have some odd lots. <br />Those same formulas we talked about previously govern here as <br />well. Finally, we do have an improvement that we just passed <br />on Patton Road and in the event Brenner is also approved, the <br />Council may wish to give consideration to consolidating these <br />two projects for assessment purposes. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN JOHNSON: I take it that lot 3065, because it's <br />part of both improvements, will pick up the frontage on Patton <br />and (inaudible) on Brenner. <br /> <br />MR. DROWN: That's correct. <br /> <br />MR. POPOVICH: Mayor and members of the Council, the total <br />published cost of this improvement is $90,9-76.63. There are <br />1869.97 assessable feet according to the formula. If it was <br />100% assessed it would be $48.65 per front foot. Using the <br />recommendation of only 25% being assessed, it works out to <br />$12.16 per front foot, which again I would recommend be done <br />over the ten year period as we discussed before. If you were <br />to combine this improvement later - you don't have to do it <br />tonight, you could order this improvement tonight and, of <br />course, the assessment hearing is later - but just so you have <br />the figures before you, based on the engineer's estimate - if <br />you were to combine this improvement with the Patton improve- <br />ment - the one that was just done - this one has 72% of the <br />affected property owners and the other one was 50% plus with <br />the gentleman that came up tonight with an additional 85 feet - <br />you add those two improvements together and the total cost <br />would be $153,129.65. You would then have 3361.57 assessable <br />feet, for a total of $45.55, which works out to $11.38 per <br /> <br />2 <br />