res_7325 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

COUNCILV~~ KE~R: That's why I wanted that knoll cut out of there and moved UD towards victoria, since you're going to ~xc;vate there an~'ay for that holding pond. Then you might just as well cut that knoll out and move it up. MR. HONCHELL: Moving this little knob out toward the Victoria side is not a major cost. MAYOR DEMOS: We will now go to the reconstruction of Brooks and Transit Avenues from Lexington to Victoria Avenues, plus the installation of a water service - Improvement W-P-80-31. MR. POPOVICH: Mayor and members of the Council, the total cost of this project is $359,l5l.10. This is an M.S.A. project so none of this will be ,assessed against the property owners. There is an assessment for one parcel of property for a water service - $710.42. We would recommend that that be tied into the same length of assessment as the storm sewer portion. If there is some way to get rid of this one assessment in this improvement itself, we wouldn't have to carry it on the books. I \ MAYOR DEMOS: Are there any written statements? MR. NORTH: The only statement we have is the petition that I referred ko earlier regarding the storm sewer from the five different property owners on Transit. They are also supporting the upgrading of the street. (The five property owners were Katherine Anderson, 917 Transit; Roger Christensen, 944 Transit; Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Smith, 895 Transit; Mr. and Mrs. Harvey Slettedahl, 885 Transit; and Greg Revering, 912 Transit.) MAYOR DEMOS: again ask that you and the address of This is the paving I will open this hearing to the public and come to the microphone and give your name the property to which you're referring. of Brooks and Transit and one water service. MR. MERVIN HITES, 882 Transit: I would like to vote in favor of this project. MR. CARL ANDERSON, 917 Transit: I'm in .favor of the project. I'd like to comment about the parking, particularly the area on Brooks. I did talk to one neighbor and they indicated interest - along the park - there ,is a'problem with parking, especially in the evening. Young adults, teenagers, they come home late at night, I'm sure they want to step out of the car and into the garage - things like that - so I would suggest that if parking is banned that it be banned on the north side on Brooks. On Transit, I guess I have no feelings one way or the other at this time. I see no reason why it couldn't be banned on the north side on Brooks and the south side on Transit. I have no feeling on Transit though. One other comment about the parking - occasionally, I don't know if it's happened recently - but there's a ball field just 13