My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_7325
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
07xxx
>
7300
>
res_7325
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:15:49 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:11:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
7325
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. W-P-80-31 Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 and Ordering Preparation of Plans and Specifications Therefor
Resolution Date Passed
3/8/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MR. THOLE: It was for parking - it was a one buck deal. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: We can take care of it. The paving of <br />Brooks and Transit and a water service. At this time I will <br />close this hearing and ask for the Council's action. <br /> <br />MR. HARVEY SLETTEDAHL, 885 Transit: Could I speak on <br />the parking? I live on the north side of Transit and I see no _ <br />absolutely no reason for any ban of parking along there. There <br />are times when it's nice to have somebody be able to park - <br />when you have company and more than two automobiles show up. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: On state aid streets, unless we go to 42 <br />feet, we have to ban parking on one side. This is because <br />you're carrying all this traffic, if you want it to move through, <br />for emergency vehicles, etc. - that is the reason. The only way <br />you can have parking on both sides of an M.S.A. road is if you <br />do go to 42 feet wide. I guess I feel 42 is rather excessive <br />for this particular area. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN JOHNSON: If Mr. Slettedahl was to talk to his <br />neighbors along that area and the concensus was - on that <br />piece of Transit - that parking would be banned on the other <br />side of it - I assume this is still flexible and we could <br />change this? <br /> <br />( <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: You could change that up until the time you <br />put the signs:up. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN JOHNSON: So if you want to check it aut with <br />your neighbors on both sides of the street - maybe you could <br />come up with a consensus. We have to take the parking off of <br />one side or the other. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: That's for that piece of Transit only. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN JOHNSON: Yes. I'm not talking about Brooks. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: Just to clarify that a little - the State <br />will require an official resolution of our action - establishing <br />where it's banned and where it's not. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN JOHNSON: So the Council would have to take <br />action but it's still flexible until we take that action. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: To process the plans they'll want to have <br />a copy of this. <br /> <br />MR. POPOVICH: You'll pass the resolution tonight but <br />it's subject to amendment later. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN KEHR then introduced the following resolution <br />and moved its adoption: <br /> <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.