My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
res_7359
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
07xxx
>
7300
>
res_7359
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:16:14 AM
Creation date
4/25/2005 12:12:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Resolutions
Resolution #
7359
Resolution Title
Ordering the Construction of Improvement No. P-82-7 Under and Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 and Ordering Preparation of Plans and Specifications Therefor
Resolution Date Passed
6/14/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />some potholes - it's not awful - you can certainly drive it - but <br />it does have some problems. The roadway as it stands today is <br />approximately 29 feet in width with a bituminous road-mix sur- <br />face. There are some trees along the right-of-way. These are <br />not right up against it and we really don't anticipate any real <br />tree problems. Tpere are several driveways coming out onto the <br />road - most of these are fairly flat, as are the yards, and match <br />the roadway quite well. The School District does have some <br />drives that - we'll use the term "slope the wrong way". Normally <br />yards and driveways slope toward the street - on the School Dis- <br />trict property there are a co~ple that slope away from the <br />street. The soil is of fairly decent sandy clay and we antici- <br />pate no particular problems. We've investigated the sanitary <br />sewers in the area and found no unusual problems with that. <br /> <br />The roadway that's proposed to be constructed is what we <br />call a typical residential design. It would be 32 feet wide, <br />centered in the right-of-way, have a bituminous wearing surface <br />and gravel underneath it to help carry the load. It's proposed <br />that the curb and gutter be approximately six inches high and <br />what's known as straightback curb - almost straight up and down. <br />The reason we feel this is desirable is that it aids in snow <br />plowing and aids in avoiding what we term "lawn jobs" - in the <br />middle of the night suddenly you have tracks going across your <br />greenery. It tends to better define and dress up the edge of <br />the roadway. Where all of the land is developed, as in this <br />case, that's possible to construct and it's our recommendation. <br />The area in the boulevard would then be resodded where it may <br />be affected, although we don't anticipate this to be severe. <br />We anticipate the road to be put in just a few inches lower than <br />it is today, the reason for that being that you have a six inch <br />curb and therefore the curb could essentially match the existing <br />ground. No particular changes in grades., pretty well matching <br />what's there, with no tree problems. <br /> <br />One thing about this particular project that's somewhat <br />different than the norm is that you'll notice the entire south- <br />ern half of the project is what we call sideyard frontage. <br />What that means is that the distances - such as Lot 1 you see <br />on Sheldon - there the shortest, for a corner lot, are called <br />frontage. In this case, there's a 98 foot dimension for Lot 1, <br />which is 2943 Sheldon, so Sheldon would be determined as the <br />frontage. There's about 140 feet of distance along Millwood, <br />which is proposed for the improvement, and since that's the <br />longer dimension that's the one deemed to be the side lot. <br />It's been the practice in the City of Roseville for many years <br />for a side lot not to be fully assessed. The current practice <br />is only to assess 1/10 of the distance so that that property at <br />2943 Sheldon, in this case, would have approximately 14 assess- <br />able feet. You see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 lots, all of which are <br />side lots and only 10% of that is assessable. That means that <br />the total number of assessable feet on this three block project <br />is considerably less than you usually get because normally <br />there's a lot more frontage on both sides of the street., As <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.