My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-07-26_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2011
>
2011-07-26_PWETC_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2011 9:41:17 AM
Creation date
7/22/2011 9:11:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
7/26/2011
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Schwartz noted the need to look at collector streets; and other policy models. <br />Member Gjerdingen referenced the DePlaines, IL model addressing other <br />agencies or interested parties contributing to a policy. <br />Vice Chair Vanderwall spoke in support of the once per year deadline, allowing <br />for more efficiencies and meshing projects together. <br />Member Felice noted the need for other items outside normal funding realms (e.g. <br />pedestrian bridge over Snelling Avenue) and questioned whether a "wish list" or <br />portfolio of dream wises could be put together for future consideration as <br />potential funding was available or as related projects developed. <br />Mr. Schwartz advised that the City Council had discussed such a wish list, and <br />thought it would be appropriate, while outside the realm of a neighborhood traffic <br />policy, but similar to the Pathway Master Plan. Mr. Schwartz noted that this <br />would allow consideration of those things as funding oppo 'ties arose and how <br />they would fit in various areas as they redeveloped. <br />Vice Chair Vanderwall referenced techniques used by Kiev, Ukraine as an <br />example for tunnels, even with winter weather considerations, rather than <br />pedestrian bridges and the markets and other community events in those tunnels. <br />Vice Chair Vanderwall noted the significant infrastructure cost to build them, but <br />reminded Commissioners that looking up may not be the only way to go. Vice <br />Chair Vanderwall advocated for his previously stated desire for a way for <br />residents on the south side of Highway 36 to access Rosedale; and highlighted the <br />resent results at Sienna Green Apartments in handling their storm water <br />management their ride in the pro'ect and encouraged Commissioners to <br />review it. <br />Page 9 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.