Laserfiche WebLink
county or local; established streets versus newly - constructed streets; and current <br />practice for Roseville to "push the minimum" of eleven foot (11') wide lanes. <br />Ms. Bloom noted the need for consistent, city -wide established criteria for <br />requests, including those to close or open roads, and based on functional <br />classification, traffic patterns, number of vehicles and their speeds, whether <br />someone could request a cul -de -sac and what criteria would determine approval <br />of such a request; and the overall goal to assist staff in providing better customer <br />service through a traffic management policy. <br />Ms. Bloom noted the need to have this policy as part of the tool box to provide <br />rankings but not set expectations. <br />Wor "q- <br />Further discussion of items to include in the Roseville model policy included <br />multiple and specific illustrations to provide sufficient understanding for the <br />public; aerials of various types of road or similar situations to those requests being <br />considered; costs associated with each physical improvement or conversion; and <br />consideration of trial or temporary applications before permanent changes are <br />installed. <br />Discussion ensued related to staffing to meet demand; traffic engineer versus city <br />engineer expertise; funding to cover those additional costs (e.g. 25% of <br />Page 6 of 11 <br />