CC_Minutes_2011_0711 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,July 11,2011 Page 11 vey. Councilmember McGehee opined that she found it disappointing that those majority unsupported items were included as a large part of this initial request Councilmember McGehee referenced this information as from that on Page 9 of the Parks and Recreation Survey where 61% of residents supported an increase for walking, biking and nature trails. Ms. McGehee noted that that area was the only area that had a majority of citizen support. Councilmember McGehee noted citizen support for needed playground maintenance (18%); however questioned the accuracy of an earlier statement indicating there were unsafe playground sit- uations or equipment at this time. Mr. Brokke indicated that there was no "un- safe" playground equipment currently within the park system and that earlier sug- gestion that there was had been in error. Councilmember McGehee referenced "upgrade park buildings/warming houses" as addressed in the survey as having received limited citizen support of only 6%; however, she noted the inclusion of six (6) areas for proposed building replacement with buildings that appeared to be intended to serve as mini-community centers. While some warming houses may need replacing, Councilmember McGehee opined that this appeared to be due to a lack of maintenance to-date; and further opined that in evaluating the survey to- gether with this proposal, she would support spending $3 million for "walking, biking, and nature trails"; however, as a majority, citizens didn't support building replacement, she would not support bonds for such activity. Councilmember McGehee opined that she had a problem with fairness in a program where a community center was not provided for everyone's benefit, but as special interest mini-community centers were provided that would benefit certain neighborhoods. She opined that she did not believe that today's economics support such a con- cept. Councilmember Willmus noted that those items identified in Attachment B to the RCA were not pulled from thin air, but identified as part of the lengthy communi- ty-driven Master Plan process, in addition to the survey. Councilmember Will- mus asked Chair Etten and Mr. Brooke to respond to that Master Plan process ba- lanced with Councilmember McGehee's comments and concerns with survey re- sults and this proposal. Mr. Brokke noted that the survey, while focusing on the dollars citizens were willing to pay, also focused on individual and detailed information, and what citi- zens were willing to pay based on what they deemed most important. Mr. Brokke opined that it was important to cross-tabulate the survey percentages for those areas of interest. Mr. Brokke noted that the primary and first step identified in the Master Plan process was citizen preference for the existing amenities and facili- ties in the park system; heard often, and loud and clear from citizens expressing their interest in taking care of what we have. Mr. Brokke advised that the com- munity spoke adamantly that they were interested in the warming houses being more than just a warming house, but serving as a community/neighborhood ga- thering place, where programming could take place; and not to replace them as is, but work with the community to develop a facility based on the constellation con-