Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~~ <br /> <br />f <br />, <br /> <br />Minut~s of Peotilar Councl I Ueetlnp <br />Vi 1 la~e of Jlrden Hili s <br />September 25, 1972 <br />Village Hall <br /> <br />Ca II to Order <br /> <br />The meeting was eel 'ed to order at 8:00 p.m. by ~ayor Crepeau. <br /> <br />Roll Cal! <br /> <br />Present: <br /> <br />~aycr Crepeau, Councilmen Dlmen, Hollenhorst, <br />Henderlon Bnd Herrick <br /> <br />; <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Absent: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />Also Present: Clerk Administrator Lorraine Stromoulst, Treasurer <br />Richard O'Kelly, Attorney Vincent P. Courtney and <br />Enpineer Donald lund. <br /> <br />l'p!lr'oVIl1 of Hir~tes <br /> <br />The minute,S of the Repular Counci I meetln!,! of Septe!'<lber II, 1972, <br />ware approved as s~bmitted. <br /> <br />The ml~utes of the Special Council meatino of September 6, 1972, <br />wer~ epprove~ as submitted. <br /> <br />The minutes of the Speci~! Council meetlnp of September 7, 1972, <br />were approved as amended. <br /> <br />BUSiNESS FRO~ THE FLOOr <br /> <br />Outdoor Booy~ Re(jua~.::- - PIlL Te!!-~pel~~i: <br /> <br />Motion was made by Hollenhorst, Seconded by ~errick 1"0 grant permis- <br />sion to the Pig Ten Supper Club to allow a missionary group to hold <br />an outdoor bOOYB on the Big Ten Supper Club gr~unds on Sunday, Oct. 8, <br />1972, from noon to 6:00 p.m.; liGuor sllles allowed, approval sutject <br />to VI l!age Attorney Courtney's approval. Motion carrJ$d unanimously. <br />Iird6fl Hil!.s poi 'ce depart!!'!!nt asked to patrol the area on the date <br />held. <br /> <br />REPORT OF VILLAGE ATTDRMEYCOURTNEY <br /> <br />license Amendment Draft <br />N.:J report. <br /> <br />Case No. 72-~~ Pe~jo~ <br /> <br />Attorney Ccul-tney reviswed l'l spec:fal use permit d,aft and, after <br />dlscussiorl w.ith the Councf I, it wllsBmen(jr:d. <br /> <br />Motion was made by Nollenhorst, seconded bV DI~en. thet Case No. 72-35 _ <br />Speci~! Use Permit be approvecl as amended; In favor: CrepP.'au, Olmen, <br />Henderson; opposed: Herrick; motion carried. <br /> <br />. After discussIon by the Council <lnd Pc;mtom At','orney Hennan. it was <br />agreed to concur with th.opinion of the Ardan Hills Planning Com- <br />mlsslon that rezanin~ of the property 'or the Pemtom project Is <br />unnecesS'ary. Attorney Herman withdrew the Pamto!!> erpl Icatlon for <br />rezonin9. <br /> <br />Motion was mode by <br />plans for Case No. <br />Ord:nanoe ,No~ 98. <br />opposed: Herrick; <br /> <br />Ho!IBnhorst, seconded by Olmen, that the prelimInary <br />72-35 be approved In accordance with Section 5, <br />In favor: Crepeau, Oi~en, Hoflenhorst. Henderson: <br />motion cai"ried., <br /> <br />The admtnistrBtiv8 fee detailed in Section 5, Ordinance 9A, must be <br />plid by the developer. <br /> <br />-1- <br />