Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Minut~8 of Regular Council Meeting <br />Village of Arden Hills <br />Tuesday, May 27, 1980 - 7:30 p.m. <br />Village Hall <br /> <br />Call to Order <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, Mayor crepeau called the <br />maeting to order at 7:30 p,m. <br /> <br />Roll Call <br />Present: <br /> <br />Mayor Henry J. Crepeau, Jr" Councilmen Ward Hanson, <br />James Wingert, Charlie Crichton, Robert Woodburn <br /> <br />Absent: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />Also Present: Village Attorney James Lynden, Planner Orlyn Miller, <br />Treasure r Donald Lamb, Cle rk Adminis tra tor',Charlotte <br />McNicsh, Deputy Clerk Dorothy Zehm <br /> <br />Approval of Minutes <br />Wingert moved, seconded by Crichton, that the Minutes of the Regular <br />Council Meeting of May 12, 1980 be approved as amended. Motion <br />carried unanimously, <br /> <br />Business from the Floor <br />None <br /> <br />REPORT OF VILLAGE ATTORNEY JAMES L~NDEN <br /> <br />Resolution No. 80-29 - Abating AssessmentB, Water Improvement <br />No, Z7-5 and 78-2, C&liguire <br />Woodburn moved, seconded by Hanson, that Council adopt Resolution <br />No. 80-29, Resolution Deleting Assessments for Water Improvement <br />Nos. 77-5 and 78-2, as to Parcel No. 25-01600-200-53 and authorize <br />execution thereof. Motion carried unanimously, If required by <br />Ramsey County, Council authorized execution of the Application for <br />Relief, also, <br /> <br />Special._lIse Permit - Case No, 80.'10, Kinder-Care <br />Council was referred to Lynden's letter of 5/23/80 and attached <br />Special lIse Permit - Case No. SO-lO, <br /> <br />Hanson moved, seconded by Woodburn, that Council approve Special Use <br />Permit - Case No. 80-10, Motion carried unanimously, <br /> <br />(McNiesh to fill in the blanks on Page 1 after determining whether <br />Kinder-Care, Inc. is a Minnesota corporation.) <br /> <br />Report~. Uniform Fire Code <br />Council was refeyred to Lynden's letter of 5/27/80 which he distributed <br />to Council and verbally summarized. Two concerns were expressed: <br /> <br />1. Who collects fees, end <br />2. Who has power of overseeing, <br /> <br />Wingert reported tbat he read a news article which inferred that <br />if a municipality does not adopt the Code, it is up to the State <br />Fire Marshal to enforce; if City does adopt the Code, it must have <br />its own fire marshal.. Lynden said adoption of the Code is not <br />mandatory; it is permissive, <br /> <br />Hanson noted that the Fire Chief reported some buildings to be unsafe; <br />queries whether these situations could be referred to the State Fire <br />Marshal and thereby relieve City of liability, Lynden explained <br />that if the Code is adopted, City might be assuming a liability; if <br />State is inspecting, State is responsible. <br /> <br />Crichton suggested that any known infraction. be referred to the <br />State Fire Marshal; after information relative to inspections aud <br />fees, etc. is obtained, Council can reconsider adorti.oll of the Code~ <br /> <br />/ <br />