My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1995_PSC_minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Police Civil Service Commission
>
Minutes
>
1995
>
1995_PSC_minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 11:01:15 AM
Creation date
10/10/2012 10:00:32 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mzr�uTEs <br />ROSEVILLE POLICE CIVIL SERVICE COMMIS3TON <br />JANIIARY i9, 1995 <br />The meeting was called to order by Jack Weidenbach, Chairman, at <br />5:05 p.m. <br />Meinbers Present : <br />Others Preser�t: <br />APPROVAL �F MTNUTL�S <br />Olson moved, King <br />1994, be approved. <br />Nays: None. <br />Bob King, Jack Weidenbach, and Joe Olson. <br />Deputy Chzef Tom Alleva, Sally Chial, Officers <br />Ann o'Neill, Steve Frazer, Mike Palermo, and <br />Lorne Rosand. <br />seconded, that the mintttes of December 14, <br />Roll CaII, Ayes: King, Weidenbach, and Olson. <br />NEW BUS�NESS <br />l. Dr. Gary Fischler, from the Institute of Forensic Psychalogy, <br />was there to present an instrument that could be used for <br />future sergeant testzng. His presentation included a <br />comprehensive explanation of a clinical instrumen� that he <br />would propose the City use for future test�ng. <br />The components included in the testing are: MMpI-2, CpI <br />Pvlice opinion Survey, Intelligence Test, personal interview, <br />role playing/problem solving, and a sociogram where the <br />candidates wauld rate each other. Additionally, he would <br />collect data from different sources. The inveniory is based <br />on psycha�ogicaZ characteristics, which would help assess a <br />fit for the position of sergeant. Several questions and <br />d�scussion follawed. <br />2. The second presenter was Harry BruZl, from Personnel <br />Decisions, Inc. (PDI}. The presentation included a breakdown <br />of four categories in which PDI would proceed with testing. <br />The first category is an interview situation where PDI would <br />ask the candidate to tell them about themselves. <br />Ca�egoxy No. 2 is testing, which would be validated <br />situational judgment testing. This is with a comman sense <br />approach--situations that real police officers face, which <br />would show how they exercise pxofessional judgment, and how <br />they would handle interpersonal situations. <br />The third category is a simulatzon which wouZd have the <br />candidates show you how they wou�d handle situations. Thzs <br />is done through a process called an "in basket", which is <br />done on paper, a lzve situation which is interacting with <br />probZems with suboz-dinates, and through an interview <br />approach. <br />The fourth category would be getting references by asking <br />other people and have others eva�uate them. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.