Laserfiche WebLink
EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br /> CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br /> Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City <br /> of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was held on the 21st day of October 2013 at 6:00 <br /> p.m. <br /> The following Members were present: Laliberte, McGehee, Willmus, Etten and Roe: and <br /> none were absent. <br /> Council Member Willmus introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 11100 <br /> A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN OUTDOOR COMPONENT OF AN ANIMAL <br /> BOARDING AND DAYCARE FACILITY AS A CONDITIONAL USE AT 2025 RICE <br /> STREET (PF13-015) <br /> WHEREAS, The Woof Room has applied for approval of the proposed conditional use <br /> and has a purchase agreement for the property at 2025 Rice Street, which is legally described in <br /> said purchase agreement as: <br /> PIN: 13-29-23-14-0001 <br /> The South 150.0 feet of Block 1, Schwarz's Subdivision of Part of Lot 16 of Thornton's <br /> Subdivision of the North East Quarter of Section 13,Township 29 North, Range 23 West, <br /> except the West 83.0 feet thereof, also except the East 17.0 feet thereof taken for widening <br /> of the Rice Street, together with that part of adjoining vacated alley which accrued thereto <br /> by vacation thereof. <br /> WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing regarding the <br /> proposed CONDITIONAL USE on October 2, 2013, voting 6-0 to recommend approval of the use <br /> based on public testimony and the comments and findings of the staff report prepared for said <br /> public hearing; and <br /> WHEREAS, the Roseville City Council has determined that approval of the proposed <br /> CONDITIONAL USE will not result in adverse impacts to the surrounding properties based on the <br /> following findings: <br /> a. While an animal boarding facility doesn't appreciably advance the goals of the <br /> Comprehensive Plan aside from facilitating continued investment in a property, it <br /> does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan; <br /> b. The proposed use is not in conflict with such plans because none apply to the <br /> property; <br /> c. With the attendant amendment to the zoning code,the proposed outdoor component <br /> to the dog day care facility can and will meet all applicable City Code requirements; <br />