My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2013-11-07_PR_Comm Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Minutes
>
2013
>
2013-11-07_PR_Comm Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2014 2:07:19 PM
Creation date
1/15/2014 2:07:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />ROSEVILLE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION <br />DRAFT MEETING MINUTES FOR NOVEMBER 7, 2013 <br /> <br />ROSEVILLE CITY HALL ~ 6:30pm <br /> <br />PRESENT: <br />Azer, Boehm, Diedrick, Doneen, Gelbach, D. Holt, M. Holt, Stoner, Wall <br />ABSENT: <br />Simbeck notified staff ahead of time about being unable to attend <br />STAFF: <br />Anfang, Brokke, Evenson, Johnson <br />OTHERS: <br />Gary Grefenberg, Michael Schroeder, Tim McILwain, Tim Wold <br /> <br /> <br />1. INTRODUCTIONS <br /> <br />2. ROLL CALL/PUBLIC COMMENT <br /> <br />Gary Grefenberg spoke on behalf of the 75 households affiliated with SWARM (South West <br />Area Roseville Monitor) in regards to Renewal Projects proposed for the Southwest quadrant <br />of Roseville. Mr. Grefenberg made it very clear that he was not speaking on behalf of all of <br />Southwest Roseville, just for the SWARM association membership. <br /> <br /> <br />Grefenberg recognized the efforts of the Commission and the Parks and Recreation <br />department to involve our community throughout the Master Plan and Renewal <br />Program processes and truly appreciates the level of engagement that has taken place. <br /> <br /> <br />Grefenberg spoke of the disappointment by SWARM in the recent ranking of <br />potential Pathway Projects by the Public Works Commission. Earlier in the planning <br />process the County Road B Pathway was listed as a high priority, the most recent ranking <br />places the County Road B Pathway as #40 out of 40. <br /> <br />Grefenberg reminded the Commission that County Road B is a major artery in <br />o <br />Southwest Roseville and the most important connection in SW Roseville. <br /> <br />There currently is no easy pedestrian access to Brimhall School, Fairview <br />o <br />Community Center or Evergreen Park due to no pathway, no sidewalk and no <br />striped shoulder. <br /> <br />Residents in this area have been asking for a sidewalk along County Road B <br />o <br />for 20 years. <br /> <br />Grefenberg is asking the Commission to give consideration for ranking the <br />o <br />County Road B pathway higher. <br /> <br />Grefenberg also voiced concern about the level of involvement by the <br />o <br />Pathway Committee and Public Works Commission in relation to their lack of <br />involvement in earlier Master Plan work. <br /> <br />Commission Chair Holt recognized and thanked Grefenberg for his efforts to <br />o <br />share information in SW Roseville and encourage engagement among <br />neighbors. <br /> <br />Brokke talked briefly on how the trails and pathway Renewal Program funds <br />o <br />will be used based on what takes places with the County Road B-2 pathway <br /> and its final costs. <br /> <br /> <br />Grefenberg spoke to the openness of the NRATS meetings and the feeling he has had <br /> that the group is not open to all for comments and recommendations. <br /> <br />Brokke briefed the group on the history of the NRATS (Natural Resources <br />and Trails Subcommittee). <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.