Laserfiche WebLink
<br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING OF THE <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of <br />Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was held on the 23rd day of July 2001, at 6:30 p.m. <br /> <br />The following members were present: Mastel, Maschka, Kysylyczyn, Klausing, and Goedeke <br />and the following were absent: None <br /> <br />Council Member Kysylyczyn introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 9908 <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION APPROVING A TWO FOOT VARIANCE FROM SECTION <br />10071012.02B2 OF THE ROSEVILLE CITY CODE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT <br />222 NORTH MCCARRONS BOULEVARD (PF 3321) <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Amy and Gregg Peterson have requested a two foot variance from Section <br />1012.02B2 of the Roseville City in order to replace an existing fence to a heigh of six fee in the <br />front yard; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Peterson property is located at 222 North McCarrons Boulevard and <br />legally described as: <br /> <br />That part of Lot 32, Thorntons Subdivision of the Northeast ~ of Section 13, Township <br />29, Range 23, lying northerly of a line 217.00feet north of the most southerly line of said <br />Lot 32 and its westerly extension, as measured at right angles thereto and parallel with <br />said moth southerly line, and lying east of the west 85.00 feet thereof, according to the <br />recorded plat thereof(PID # 132923140041) <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Section 1012.02B2 of the Roseville City Code requires only a fence 48 <br />inches (four feet) in height in a front yard; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the front yard of a home is determined to be that area that lies from the front <br />property line to the front line of the principal structure; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Peterson request desires a variance to construct a six foot tall fence a <br />minimum of three feet from the front property line; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission held a public hearing regarding the <br />Peterson variance request and recommended (7-0) to approve the request, based on findings <br />outlined in Section 4 of the project report dated 7/11/01. <br /> <br />1 <br />