My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2017-8-3_PR Comm Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Minutes
>
2017
>
2017-8-3_PR Comm Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/8/2017 4:04:14 PM
Creation date
9/8/2017 4:04:13 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION <br />DRAFT MEETING MINUTES FOR <br />August3, 20176:30pm <br />PRESENT: <br />Baggenstoss,Bole, Gelbach,Hoag,Stoner, Warzecha <br />ABSENT: <br />Heikkila, Newby, O’Brien <br />STAFF: <br />Brokke,Christensen <br />INTRODUCTIONS <br />1. <br />ROLL CALL/PUBLIC COMMENT <br />2. <br />Chair Gelbach announced that Heikkila, Newby and O’Brien notified staff prior that they <br />would not attend. No public in attendance. <br />APPROVAL OF MINUTES –June6,2017MEETING <br />3. <br />Commissioner Hoagmovedto approve the June6, 2017 meeting minutes. Commissioner <br />Warzechaseconds. Motion passedunanimously. <br />PARK DEDICATION METHOD DISCUSSION <br />4. <br />Staff providedahistory of Park Dedication in Roseville and updated the Commission on the <br />current Roseville method. Current Roseville rates in residential areas is 10% of land or <br />$4,000 per unit. Non-residential areas is5% of land or 10% of Fair Market Value (FMV). <br />As part of the Subdivision Code discussion, it wassuggested that the non-residentialrate be <br />the same at10% for both landdedication and cashdedication. As a result, the City Council <br />asked that staff review and evaluate theLeague of MN Cities Sample Park Dedication <br />Methodologywith the Parks and Recreation Commission. <br />Chair Gelbach inquired on what the role of the Commission will be in reviewing the League <br />of MN Cities methodology. Staff confirmed that the City Council will be looking for <br />thoughts and a recommendation on what might be best forRoseville. <br />Staff provided a step-by-step walk throughofexamples ofthe League of MN Cities7-step <br />methodologyfor determining Park Dedication amounts. <br />Chair Gelbach questioned how“need” was definedin Step 3 of the League of MN Cities <br />Methodology.Staff answered thatitwasdefined by use. Roseville has assignedause of <br />approximately 75% (or “need”) toresidentsand 25% of “need”to Roseville workers.This is <br />simply an estimate includingananalysis of Recreation Program Registrations. <br />Commissioner Hoag inquiredif a Community Center is included in the “need” category. <br />Staff stated that a Community Center was not includedspecificallyin the “need” calculation. <br />However, the acreage could be. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.