Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Regular Meeting Roseville Planning Commission <br />Wednesday, June 2, 1965 . 7:30 P.M. <br /> <br />Members present: James Nelson, Anderson, Linebarger, Sigford, L. O. Nelson, <br />Membrez, Remsburg absent. Also present were Dahlgren, Village <br />Pl&lner, Grauel, Trustee and Odl&ld, Public Works Director. <br /> <br />L. O. Nelson moved, James Nelson seconded, to approve the minutes of the regular <br />meeting of May 5th as submitted. Approved by a unanimous vote. <br /> <br />File 65-273 - Division of an existing lot, request by Archie Johnson. 2100 North <br />Lexington Avenue. The applicant failed to appear at the meeting, <br />therefore, Linebarger moved, Sigford seconded, to lay the matter over <br />until the July 7th meeting. Carried by a unanimous vote. <br /> <br />File 65-265 . Rezoning request from R-l to R.3 by Angelo Carbone of the property on <br />Hamline Avenue across from Oakcrest. The secretary read a letter <br />received from the petitioner in which he requested that the matter be <br />continued to our July 7 meeting because the development plans were not <br />completed. Membrez moved, Nelson seconded, to postpone this matter until <br />July 7th. Carried by a unanimous vote. <br /> <br />File 65-266 Rezoning request from R-I to I-I by George Hart of the property on <br />Terminal Road, across from Murphy Transfer. Mr. Hart had no definite <br />plans as to how the property was to be used. He stated the use of the <br />property for single residences was almost an impossibility because of <br />the industrial development surrounding the subject property. He also <br />said the burden of taxes and assessments was fast becoming unbearable. <br /> <br />Most of the residents south of the subject property on Highway 36 were <br />strongly opposed to this rezoning. Mr. Patrick Flaherty, attorney, <br />spokesman for the group, said that Mr. liart was conducting his business <br />allowing poor housekeeping and that if he was to clean up a Ii tt Ie <br />there were possibilities to use the subject property for single residences. <br />There was a question in the mind of the members of the Planning Commission <br />as to whether or not a development of single residences was reasonable. <br />It was finally moved by Membrez, seconded by Linebarger that because <br />Mr. Hart had no development plans for the property that we recommend to <br />the Village Council to deny the zoning request. Carried by a unanimous <br />vote. <br /> <br />File 65-270 Rezoning request and special use permit from I-I to B-3 by Robert S. <br />Herbst, Jr. of the property at the southwest corner of County Road C and <br />Cleveland Avenue. Mr. Herbst proposed to construct a 60 unit motel for <br />drivers with parking under the building, a bar and a restaruant. However, <br />Mr. Dahlgren, in his report dated June 2, called the attention that the <br />legal description was incorrect, therefore, the commission could not <br />legally consider this request unless the correct legal description was <br />correct in the published notice. It was agreed to consider this matter <br />at a special meeting scheduled on June 21st at 5:00 P.M. with instructions <br />to the Village office to republish the correct legal description. <br /> <br />File 65-269 Special Use Permit - Target Stores, Inc. The Planning Commission was <br />informed that the applicant had withdrawn his request, therefore, no <br />action on this matter was taken. <br />