Laserfiche WebLink
Method Used for Predicted Pay Line Calcufation in the Statistical <br />AnaNysis <br />The fo�lowing explanation is a general <br />description of i�ow predicted pay is calculated <br />but doas n.ot include all details of the formula in <br />Minnesota Rules Chapter 3920. <br />Basis of the Statistieal Analysis <br />A. The definition in �he Loca1 Government Pay <br />Equity Act for equitable compsnsation <br />relationship says "...compensation for <br />female-dominated ciasses is not consistently <br />below the compensation for �nale-dominated <br />classes of c�mpa�rable value..." <br />B. The fozmula for the statistical analysis is <br />based an three concepts found in the above <br />definition: compaxable value, mala <br />compensation and consistently below. <br />�, <br />:� <br />� <br />� + <br />3�0 �----�-----••------- . ........ ...............-• ----- ��. . ..... ......-- <br />� T1'il <br />l �fjf.� <br />� <br />* * <br />��� aub n <br />........ __'— 1� y,� .... . .... ................ <br />� i, * �` i class 3eing analyzen <br />.......... I . ....i _ ... . . . <br />� .I � ......... ....... <br />I � <br />t I <br />F I <br />Except for classes in the lower and upper <br />i0% of the point range, comparable value is <br />da�ned by drawing a 20% window around <br />the job class being analyzed. Each windaw <br />extends 10% of the range of points on each <br />side of the class. In the exaznple, there is a <br />range of 200 points from lowest to highest, <br />so 10% wouid be 20 points. Each window <br />tnust have at least three rnale classes {two of <br />which have different points) and rt�ust <br />include at least 20% of all male classes in <br />�he jurisdiction. If this cri�eria is not met, <br />the window wili expand at 5% incremen�s <br />on either side until the required number of <br />male classes are incluc�ed. The drawing <br />below shows one window for one class. <br />�----- * <br />� <br />------� �-��--... � . ..........................--... <br />....---��-----.....--�•---...----••----..........-------�--' <br />+ <br />.............---...---...---.........••••..........---....._s <br />i <br />� <br />. . . . . ... . . ... . . .. • • •. . .. _.. . • • • •...---.....---- ----.. . .... � <br />1�f� '�t� � f� 18� �UD 2�� �4� 260 2�} 30� <br />Poir� <br />* h![a[e Jab� �+ F�rn Joba .._! <br />L Defining "Comparable Value <br />Guide to Understanding Pay Equrty Compliance and Computer Reports —1 II10 Page 1� <br />