Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—January 10, 2011 12 <br /> City Administrator Klaers stated Mn/DOT is proposing an improvement project for the <br /> interchange of I-694/TH51 in Arden Hills. In June, 2010, Mn/DOT submitted a Mn/DOT <br /> approved layout to the City, requesting City approval (Municipal Consent) of the layout. On <br /> August 9, 2010, the City Council held a public hearing for this project. On October 25, 1010, the <br /> City Council adopted Resolution 2010-052 Disapproving the Final Layout of I-694/TH 51 with <br /> Conditions. On December 13, 2010, the City received a response, in the form of a letter, from - <br /> Thomas K. Sorel, Commissioner of Transportation. The letter states that MnlDot will be <br /> initiating the Municipal Consent Appeal Process. Mn/DOT has appointed Mr. Greg Ous, <br /> Assistant Division Director for Operations Division, as their member to the three member panel. <br /> The letter asks the City to appoint their member as soon as possible. At the December 20, 2010, <br /> work session the Council briefly discussed appointing former Mayor Stan Harpstead. Once the <br /> City and Mn/DOT have appointed their members, the third member is appointed by mutual <br /> agreement between the City and Mn/DOT. If no agreement on the third member can be reached, <br /> the Chief Justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court will appoint the final member. The City may <br /> want a third member of the Appeal Board that is both technically orientated and familiar with the <br /> 1-694 corridor. Two names Staff would suggest are Mark Maloney, Public Works Director/City <br /> Engineer for Shoreview, or Mark Graham, Public Services Director/City Engineer for Vadnais <br /> Heights. Since the adoption of Resolution 2010-052, Staff has been discussing with Mn/DOT <br /> Staff the 14 conditions contained in the resolution. Staff believes that conditions 1, 5,8,12 and 13 <br /> are adequately addressed in Mn/DOT's November 29, 2010, letter. Conditions 2 and 10 Staff <br /> believes are adequate answers from Mn/DOT but require a further commitment of funding from <br /> the City for the noise wall and/or concrete sidewalk. Staff does not think conditions 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, <br /> 9, and 14 are adequately addressed by Mn/DOT's position. <br /> Mayor Grant asked the Council if they were in agreement with appointing Stan Harpstead as the <br /> City's member of the panel. He also suggested the Council discuss the funding for the noise walls <br /> and sidewalks in a work session. <br /> Councilmember Holden stated she would like to know what the monetary impacts to the City are <br /> for the noise walls and sidewalk before making a decision. She agreed that this discussion could <br /> take place at a work session. <br /> Councilmember Holden stated Mn/DOT had replied to Condition 7 by stating the Lexington <br /> Avenue Bridge would be done sometime after the 1694 project. She asked what this specifically <br /> meant. <br /> City Administrator Klaers stated Condition 7 was among those conditions Staff did not believe <br /> had been adequately answered by Mn.DOT. <br /> Councilmember Holden stated she would also be in favor of appointing either Mark Graham or <br /> Mark Maloney to the panel. She clarified she would prefer Mark Maloney because he is from <br /> Shoreview and more familiar with Arden Hills. <br /> Mayor Grant stated the Council could make the recommendation but the two members of the <br /> panel will have to agree and the third member. He stated that he would agree that Mark Maloney <br /> would be a good choice. <br />