My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8A, I 694 TH51 Municipal Consent Resolution
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
03-28-11-R
>
8A, I 694 TH51 Municipal Consent Resolution
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2024 10:32:40 AM
Creation date
3/25/2011 8:10:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
March 28, 2011 Reg. City Council Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor David Grant <br />February 28, 20'['E <br />Page Two <br />Mn1DOT response - MnIDOT has shown the �ossible noise wal� on a�rfinaf layout. The funding <br />of the noise wa�l (if requested by the city), would have �een estabiished as a lump surr� agreement <br />where the ciiy pays $475,000 towarcls the design and canstruction of th� naise wall. <br />Based or� discussions at our meeting, Mn1�OT understands t�at this naise wall is not being <br />pursued hy Arden Hills, so MnIDOT wili remove the noise wail from aur constr�ction plans. <br />3— The City reguests that MnDOT commit fhat fil! generated on fhe project wi11 first stay on the <br />project and be used for sound mrtigatian berming in aI! areas v�rhere noise walls are not prnposed. <br />,4dditiana! filf material, if it exists, shauld be used for berming along �o�h sides of 1-694 wesf of the <br />praject limits. <br />MnIDOT res�onse — M�IDOT has ir�vestigated potential barming areas on the praject. In looking <br />at berming areas, it is necessary to fook at areas that would aliow berming within the existir�g R/W. <br />The only area wi�are berming could be construc#ecf within ihe existing RMI is on the south side of I- <br />694 west of oEd TH 10. MnIDOT wauld be able to berm in this iocatior� while avading the area <br />�eeded for pondir�g. The berm would be constrcacied to meet Mnf�OT design starrdards for clear <br />zone sei�acks, drainage requirements and wetland impacts. There would be impac�s to mature <br />trees rrvith this berming. This berming woufd NOT provide any naise reduction benefi�. <br />Arden Hills sta#ed concern about the lack of noise reduction by the berm and the potential lass of <br />trees, therefore, Mt�IDOT will remove this request from consideration. <br />4— The Cify requests that MnDOT prove fhaf the traffic modeling for the 1-694/TH 51 impravement <br />considered ihe entire region artd the effeet fhe praposed grade separated intersecfion of TH 90/CR <br />96 with the loss of some movements wil! have on the enfire transportation system_ Furthermore, <br />fhe City wants MnDOT modeling to dvcument that the proposed improvemenf will cause no harm <br />and actually provide benefit to fhe county and local road system beyonci Hamline Avenue, Counfy <br />Road F, L.exingfon Avenue, County Raad E and Lexington Briafge over 1-894. <br />An �qual Opportur�ity Empfoyer <br />, �_ � : <br />" ' `� <br />- � �� � :�. • . � �T � '� , . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.