4B, Planning Case 11-019 – Hood Packaging PUD Amendment

Home Browse Search

The addition of ihe three structures is not expected io impact access traffic circulation. There would not be any reduction in parking, as al� parking is on the other side of the building. The appIicant has submitted t�ro lettexs addressing the details of ihe applica#ion, a site plan, and measui'ernents o� tk�.e proposed sir�ctures. Some of the plans for the silos and far the containment tank are presented separateIy, as the applicant is working with two different companies on these pxajects. Cornmunity Development Intern Mei-Ling Anderson reviewed the twelve findings of fact for considexation: General Findings 1. Haod Packaging Corporation is a conforming use in the Gateway Business Zone. 2. The PUD process allows for flexibiliiy within the City's regulations ihrough a negotiaied process with a developer. 3. The applicant proposes to add iwo storage silos and one containment tank to the southeast side of the building. Eack� silo is twenty-four feet tall, twelve feet in diameter, vv�th a capacity to hold sixty-five thousand pounds. The containment tank is approximately thirteen feet tail, twelve feet in diameter, with a capacity to hold ten thousanc� gallons. None of the proposed structures will exceed the height of the building. 4. This proposal will not impact lot coverage requirern.ents, nor will it encroach on setbacks. On the Conditional Use Plan Evaluatian Criteria 5. The pxoposal vvill not impact traffic circulation or parking. 6. The proposal is not expected to alter existing noise, glar�, odors, vibration, smoke, dust, air pollution, heat, liquid or solid waste, or other nuisance characteristics. The tanks and connecting pipes will be double-walled to contain the material. 7. The proposal vvill not impact drainage on the site. 8. The proposal will not impact population density on the site. 9. The proposed silos will be painted to match the colar of the building while ihe cantainmeni tank is composed of white plastic. All proposed s�uctures are unlikely ta significantly impact the subject property or s�rrounding properties. 10. Park dedication req�irements do not apply. 11. The praposal is nat anticipated to create a negafive impact on the imrnediate area or the corr�nunity as a whole. 12. The proposal does not conflict with the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Staff is recommending approval based on the findings of iact, subject to the fallowing conditions: 1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans suhmitted as aznended by ihe conditions o� appra�al. Any significant changes io these plans, as determined by