My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-12-11-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
12-12-11-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2024 12:06:40 AM
Creation date
2/28/2012 4:11:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
12-12-11 Regular Council Meeting
General - Type
12-12-11 Regular Council Meeting
Category
12-12-11 Regular Council Meeting
Date
12/12/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETNG—DECEMBER 12, 2011 8 <br /> Director Iverson reviewed how property tax bills vary from year-to-year. She also explained that <br /> the State Legislative change for 2012 replaced the Market Value Homestead Credit Program <br /> (MVHC) with a Market Value Exclusion (MVE) Program. The MVE program reduces the <br /> property's market value for tax purposes thus creating a new Taxable Market Value. The <br /> advantage is that State credits are eliminated and local governments collect their full levy. The <br /> disadvantage is that it lowers the local government's taxable market value,thus raising taxes. <br /> Director Iverson explained that market values are established in the spring by the County <br /> Assessor and approved at the Board of Appeal and Equalization in April or May. The median <br /> market value on a single family home in Arden Hills went down by 1.16 percent from Pay 2011 to <br /> Pay 2012. The total residential values (including townhomes, condos, etc.) fell by 1.97 percent. <br /> Commercial/industrial values fell by 0.64 percent. <br /> Director Iverson then reviewed the effect of adding a 2.15 percent City levy increase which <br /> would result in an addition $5.00 a year to the median value home's tax bill. She also explained <br /> how property tax dollars are distributed; for each dollar, Ramsey County receives 44 cents, the <br /> School District receives 35 cents, Arden Hills receives 17 cents and Other Agencies receive 4 <br /> cents of every dollar. The proposed 2.15 per cent levy increase is primarily made up of: Public <br /> Safety Cost increases — 1.50 percent; Elections — 0.50 percent; Salary; benefits and other costs <br /> 0.15 percent. <br /> Director Iverson stated the 2012 key budget elements are: <br /> • Revenues are expected to remain about the same. This has been conservatively estimated as <br /> the City is primarily "built-out" and has some redevelopment and expansion, but cannot be <br /> estimated. <br /> • General Fund revenues are estimated to be $4,053,626 or a 4.01 percent increase over 2011, <br /> mainly due to the increase in the tax levy. <br /> • Utility revenues will increase 12.97 percent for Water, decrease 7.32 percent for Sewer, and <br /> increase 3.28 percent for Surface Water Management. These changes reflect the increases of <br /> rates of 7 percent for Water, 2 percent for Sewer, and 3 percent for Surface Water <br /> Management. <br /> • The levy increase is proposed at 2.15 percent. <br /> • Salary adjustments as part of COLA/steps are budgeted at 1.5 percent. <br /> • The proposed budget for Fire Protection has increased by 3.55 percent. <br /> • The proposed budget for Police Protection and Animal Control has increased by 4.07 percent. <br /> • The proposed budget for 911 Dispatch services has increased by 16.73 percent. <br /> • The proposed budget has kept operating costs relatively flat unless there have been contract <br /> services which have increased. <br /> • The proposed budget includes the same amount of transfers as last year: <br /> o $200,000 for capital reserves to be used for road improvements <br /> o $40,000 for capital reserves to be used for equipment replacement <br /> • This proposal does not contain a contingency amount nor does it use reserves to balance the <br /> budget as has been done the last two years. <br /> • Overall, the City's total proposed budget has decreased by 5.88 percent mainly due to the <br /> fewer construction projects; General Fund budget is increased by 3.48 percent as compared to <br /> 2011. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.