Laserfiche WebLink
Parks,Trails&Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes May 15,2012 <br /> Page 2 <br /> Ms. Olson indicated that pricing for option 1 would be around $1,800 and for Option 2,the <br /> option the committee preferred, $3,000,which would still be within the budget. Ms. Olson <br /> questioned if the committee preferred having a scale as opposed to having the mileage and the <br /> consensus of the committee was to go with the scale. Ms. Olson indicated she is <br /> recommending that they not include proposed trails because the maps would look too busy. <br /> She asked that the committee review the map with the 20 proposed sign locations. Ms. Olson <br /> informed that Vacker Sign suggested having 3-4 zoomed in maps with a"you are here" arrow <br /> for each sign. In addition, each map would have a small box on the bottom showing where <br /> you are in relation to the entire City trail system. Ms. Olson asked for comments from the <br />- committee since she would like to bring this to the May 29 Council meeting for approval. She <br /> indicated that she could get a sample of a zoomed in map for the committee to see. <br /> MOTION: Committee Member Michaelson motioned that they recommend Option 2. <br /> Committee Member Kramlinger questioned if the sign at location#12 was coming from the <br /> school. Ms. Olson indicated it is at the entryway off County Road E2 and it goes into the <br /> woods. He also mentioned that he thought the sign company had reservations about cedar <br /> posts? Ms. Olson indicated that Vacker feels cedar for the posts is sufficient but not for <br /> around the signs. <br /> Committee Michaelson suggested they put the posts in concrete so the posts are well <br /> embedded. Ms. Olson indicated they could put them in concrete but Vacker Sign did not feel it <br /> was necessary. Discussion ensued and the group was in consensus of putting the posts in <br /> concrete. Ms. Olson indicated she would add the concrete to the price. <br /> MOTION: Committee Member Petersen motioned they recommend design option 2 with <br /> 20 proposed sign locations with concrete included in the installation of the posts. <br /> Committee Member Michaelson seconded the motion. The motion carried 8-0. <br /> B. Off Leash Doe Area Discussion <br /> Ms. Olson indicated she has provided them with information to begin the process of <br /> establishing a work plan for moving forward on proposing an off leash dog area. She noted the <br /> committee will need to identify possible locations and research what other cities are doing, and <br /> then put the information into a draft plan. She informed that she included information from the <br /> League of Minnesota Cities and a Risk Management Information Sheet. After speaking with a <br /> member of the League and with the City Attorney, it does not look like there will be much of a <br /> liability issue. <br /> Committee Member O'Malley suggested that when they go on the park tour they add an item <br /> to the Park Evaluation Sheets about whether the park would or would not be a good location <br /> for an off leash dog area. <br /> Chair Garretson indicated she felt this was a good idea. She suggested they not only look at <br /> parks when on the tour, but also look at those sites they feel would be good sites like the area <br /> off of Parkshore. Discussion ensued and it was the consensus of the committee to look at other <br /> areas as well. <br />