My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-09-13-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
09-09-13-R
>
09-09-13-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/9/2013 11:03:29 AM
Creation date
9/9/2013 11:02:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL JULY 8, 2013 11 <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes <br />questioned where the sidewalk was proposed to be completed in Phase <br />I. <br /> <br />Mr. Roberts <br />reviewed the location of the Phase I sidewalk stating he would prefer to complete <br />the additional length within Phase III. <br /> <br />AMENDMENT: Councilmember Holden moved and Mayor Grant seconded an <br />amendment to have the signage within the Lexington Avenue Master <br />PUD adhere to the B3 Zoning District and Sign District 6 standards. <br /> <br />Councilmember Werner <br /> stated that Phase I had a disadvantage as the rear of the building would <br />face Lexington Avenue. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden <br /> commented that her amendment was addressing the fact that the <br />applicant did not have a finalized sign package for the Council to review. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holmes <br /> did not support this amendment as the applicant would require some <br />level of flexibility on the monument sign and future tenant signs. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung <br /> understood the proposed amendment but also understood the future <br />tenants were unknown. This was the reason the sign plan was incomplete. <br /> <br />Mayor Grant <br />stated that the applicant would come back to the Council with a sign plan once the <br />tenants were finalized. For this reason, he would not support the amendment. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden <br /> questioned if the Master PUD could be approved with no sign plan. <br /> <br />Community Development Intern Bachler <br /> noted that a condition for approval required the <br />applicant to bring a final sign plan to the City at a future date. <br /> <br />The amendment failed (2-3) (Holmes, McClung and Mayor Grant <br />opposed). <br /> <br />AMENDMENT: Councilmember Holmes moved and Mayor Grant seconded an <br />amendment to require the applicant to complete the entire length of <br />the sidewalks along Red Fox Road as shown in the Master PUD in <br />Phase I and that the applicant coordinate this project with Ramsey <br />County. <br /> <br />Councilmember McClung <br /> agreed with the intent of this amendment but felt it would be <br />burdensome to the applicant. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden <br /> supported the sidewalk completion on Lexington Avenue. <br /> <br />Mr. Roberts <br /> was in favor of completing the sidewalk along Red Fox Road as shown in Phase II, <br />but requested the sidewalk along Lexington Avenue stop at the driveway entrance as shown on the <br />Phase I plan. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.