Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MARCH 31, 20148 <br /> <br />quickly the TCAAP site developed. He explained that the Council needs to have a discussion on <br />how these funds will be used in the future. He indicated that the funds could be used to cover the <br />expenses for Kimley-Horn or to cover the expense for the water feature or for park development. <br />Another option would be for the Council to offer economic incentives to new businesses. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden <br /> asked how much the City would be receiving in SAC and WAC fees. <br /> <br />City Administrator Klaers <br />estimated that the City would receive $2,485 at the current Met <br />Council rate per unit. This equated to approximately $5,000,000 at full development. He <br />explained that City SAC and WAC fees generated would assist with covering the expense of the <br />City sewer and water utilities. He noted that Stacie Kvilvang, Ehlers and Associates, is working <br />on financial studies and models that would be reviewed by the Council at future meetings. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden <br /> questioned how much of the $5,000,000 would be left after the City <br />paid for the planning reports. <br /> <br />City Administrator Klaers <br /> stated that about $500,000 would be needed for the Kimley-Horn <br />planning study. He further reported that trunk utilities would be assessed to the benefiting <br />property owners, likewise with a water tower if needed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden <br /> did not want to see expenses for the property become too high that it did <br />not develop. <br /> <br />City Administrator Klaers <br /> agreed that this is a concern for the Council to consider. <br /> <br />Mark Ruff <br />, Senior Financial Advisor at Ehlers & Associates, stated that the County engineering <br />staff has done some preliminary work on total expenses for this project. As the infrastructure RFP <br />moves forward, the City will be provided with additional information on the cost estimates. <br /> <br />Councilmember Holden <br /> stated that she would have a difficult time offering incentives when Old <br />Snelling was in need of repair, and this was an issue that affected current taxpayers. She wanted <br />to be ensured that the City would break even on the TCAAP project. <br /> <br />Mr. Ruff <br /> believed that the City did not have enough information at this time. It was his <br />expectation that the JDA was interested in creating a break even project. However, the real estate <br />market over the next five to ten years was uncertain. <br /> <br />City Administrator Klaers <br /> stated that he anticipated that the project would be self-sufficient <br />from a City financial perspective. <br /> <br />Mr. Ruff <br />discussed how some companies were offered certain incentives in order to bring them to <br />communities. <br /> <br />City Administrator Klaers <br /> stated that for this reason, he wanted the Council to have a discussion <br />on how the Met Council SAC credits would be administered in the future and to consider having a <br />policy in place. <br /> <br />