Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—JULY 13, 2015 10 <br /> City Planner Streff explained the findings of fact in Planning Case 15-015 support approval. <br /> However, if the City Council chooses to deny the application, the findings of fact would need to <br /> be amended to reflect the reasons for the denial. It was noted that the Planning Commission <br /> reviewed Planning Case 15-015 at their July 8, 2015, meeting and unanimously recommends <br /> approval of Planning Case 15-015 for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and <br /> adoption of the TCAAP Redevelopment Code (TRC) as Section 1380 of the Zoning Code, as <br /> presented in the July 13, 2015, Report to the City Council, with the public hearing comments <br /> forwarded to the City Council for consideration. <br /> Mayor Grant recommended that the Council approve each of the staff-recommended items one <br /> at a time. He noted that four votes were needed for approval of some of the recommendations. <br /> MOTION: Councilmember Holden moved and Councilmember Holmes seconded a <br /> motion to approve Resolution 2015-037, a resolution adoptinL, an amendment <br /> to the Comprehensive Plan for TCAAP property. <br /> Councilmember McClung indicated that he would not be supporting any of the staff <br /> recommendations this evening. He thanked staff for all of their work. He understood that a lot of <br /> time had been put into these items, however, he believed more work needed to be done and that <br /> additional flexibility is needed to create a world class development. He feared that by limiting the <br /> flexibility, this would limit the creativity. He wanted the City to strive for something <br /> extraordinary. <br /> Councilmember Woodburn stated that the proposed CPA was not the City's original vision for <br /> TCAAP. He believed that too large a portion was being set aside for commercial and industrial <br /> development. He also feared that the density was too high. <br /> Mayor Grant commented that he would be supporting the motion. He did not believe that plus <br /> or minus a few units would make the site a showcase. He discussed how developments have <br /> changed over the past 30 years. He encouraged the Council to keep their eyes on the prize and <br /> how this site would benefit the City in the long run. <br /> Councilmember Holden agreed that this was not a world class development given the changes in <br /> the Master Plan that have been requested by the County and which the Council has accepted. She <br /> expressed concern with the proposed amount of showroom space. She had a hard time <br /> envisioning a world class development given the level of showroom space within TCAAP. She <br /> believed that the definition of"world class" needed closer examination by both the City and the <br /> County. She explained that she would be supporting all of staff's recommendations this evening. <br /> Councilmember Holmes discussed the lengthy history of TCAAP and she believed that the <br /> Council was bringing forward the best option for the site. She reported that the TCAAP site <br /> would be developed at a density of 10 units per acre, while the remainder of Arden Hills was <br /> between two and three units per acre. She liked that TCAAP would have a variety of housing <br /> units. She fully supported the motions from staff. <br /> The motion failed 3-2 (McClung and Woodburn opposed). <br />