My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-23-99 PTRC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee (PTRC)
>
PTRC Minutes/Packets/(1968 to 2009)
>
1999-2009
>
1999
>
02-23-99 PTRC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/17/2024 2:58:30 PM
Creation date
4/18/2016 11:57:15 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
park but they are not set on spending $142,000. City Administrator Fritsinger mentioned <br />that the land is not dedicated park land but is land that was made available for park <br />purposes. Essentially, the area is dedicated space while the mobile home park exists. <br />Brian also noted that the long-term (10-15 year) comprehensive plan shows a road right <br />through the park. <br />One of the commission members asked if we could talk to the owner about donating the <br />land to the City. The Commission also wanted to know where the Highway 96 plans <br />fit into the proposed park plan. They noted that if the park had an outer trail around it <br />that it could possibly tie in with the Highway 96 project: The trail could be a part of a <br />later phase of the project. <br />Commission members felt strongly that the City should "provide the opportunity" and <br />should make the improvements for the kids and not for the owner of the facility. The <br />Commission agreed to develop a master plan for the park and to divide the improvements <br />into phases. Phase I would consist of the %2 court or full court basketball area and the <br />play structure improvements. The Commission decided it will meet with the residents in <br />March to discuss the improvements and to get their feedback/input on the project. Staff <br />will formulate ideas for the residents to respond to. <br />The Commission asked if the City Council would fund some part of the project. Megan <br />Ricke asked staff for some information on the breakdown of ages of kids in the park as <br />well as some ideas for future programs and events at the park. <br />• 5. Bethel College Park Project Tentative Hearing Dates <br />The City Council will discuss the Bethel Park Project at its February 8 Council Meeting. <br />The Commission reiterated the fact that they need more detailed information from Bethel <br />on the intramural use and that they need more specific information about what the City's <br />exact usage times would be. The Commission also mentioned that they are aware of the <br />neighborhood concerns and that they need more information before going to the <br />residents. Commission member Ricke stated that we should have someone from <br />the Chatham neighborhood serve on the commission. The Commission also indicated <br />that if the project moves forward, that a subcommittee could be established to work on <br />various issues. <br />6. Parks and Recreation Director Hiring Update <br />The deadline for applications is set for February 1. Mr. Fritsinger plans to do interviews <br />and have someone on -board by Mid -March. The Commission indicated that they would <br />like to see some interview questions related to plowing of trails, grant writing, etc. <br />Playground Structure Replacement Update <br />Mr. Fritsinger indicated that letters have been sent out to various playground <br />manufacturers. <br />County Road F Trail Update (see Council Report) <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.