My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-19-18 JDA Agenda Packet
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Joint Development Authority (JDA)
>
JDA Agenda Packets
>
2018
>
09-19-18 JDA Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2018 4:13:57 PM
Creation date
9/14/2018 4:13:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Commissioner Ortega stated he supported both documents and understood there were issues <br />that still needed to be addressed. He reiterated that these documents were between three <br />parties: the City, the County and the developer. <br /> <br />Commissioner Grant respectfully requested the placeholder number of $500,000 and language <br />regarding SAC credits be removed from the MDA. He stated he did not support the document <br />moving forward with these two items. He feared the document would gain traction and <br />wanted to be assured these items were fully vetted by both parties prior to consideration of the <br />final MDA. <br /> <br />Chair Wicklund commented the SAC issue and the reimbursement fees to Arden Hills were both <br />important issues that had to be further addressed within the MDA. He asked if the Commission <br />would be open to increasing the meeting schedule in order to facilitate the negotiation process. <br /> <br />Commissioner Grant supported more meetings so long as progress was being made by the <br />group. <br /> <br />Commissioner Ortega reported it was not this group’s job to negotiate as staff members were <br />in place for the County and the City to oversee this task. He explained the JDA was being asked <br />to consider approving a preliminary or draft MDA. <br /> <br />Commissioner Huffman stated meetings were great and would spur additional conversations. <br /> <br />Chair Wicklund agreed this was the direction the JDA should be heading. He stated it was his <br />hope additional work would be completed on the MDA for the JDA to discuss on September <br />19th to assist this group in becoming more comfortable with the overall language. <br /> <br />Commissioner Huffman stated he would still like to put this item to a vote this evening. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Huffman seconded by Commissioner Ortega to approve the Master <br />Development Agreement Summary. <br /> <br />Commissioner Grant suggested the motion be amended to remove two tension points from the <br />MDA: Issues relating to Met Council SAC fees and the amount of City reimbursement for <br />planning costs. <br /> <br />AMENDMENT: Motion by Commissioner Grant seconded by Commissioner McClung to amend <br />the motion to remove two tension points from the MDA regarding issues related to Met Council <br />SAC fees and the amount of City reimbursement for planning costs. <br /> <br />Commissioner Huffman stated he would not accept this amendment as there would be other <br />issues that may change between now and October. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.