My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-25-21-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2021
>
10-25-21-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/22/2021 10:13:10 AM
Creation date
10/22/2021 10:09:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
244
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br />From this initial work session, the City Council also identified additional concerns with building <br />façade requirements. In 2019 and 2020, the City Council held two more work sessions whereby <br />providing feedback and direction to staff on revisions for consideration in the B-2 District. The <br />Council requested staff review the transparency requirements for commercial developments as <br />well as the use of other types of coating on glass as a means of complying with ordinance <br />requirements. <br /> <br />At the work session meeting on December 21, 2020, the City Council discussed the Staff <br />suggested amendments regarding front yard setback and removal of design standard language in <br />order to allow more flexibility in placement of the buildings in B-2 District. The consensus was <br />to remove a sentence within Commercial Façade Transparency, Section 1325.05, Subd. 8, F.1 <br />that allowed discretion for waiving the transparency requirements. The rational was that this <br />flexibility already exists through the Planned Unit Development review and a Developer could <br />suggest alternate considerations. For façade transparency, the City will continue to require 50% <br />of all first level building facades that front a public street to be comprised of transparent <br />windows or doors. The language to be removed was a second requirement of 20% for all facades <br />that are reasonably visible from the right-of-way. With the language amendments to the building <br />and parking setbacks it is anticipated that there will be fewer issues on design challenges with <br />building orientation and the back side of a building facing the public street. The proposed <br />changes still ensures that the appearance of blank walls would not face the street. <br /> <br />Following the discussion, Staff was directed to bring forward the proposed ordinance <br />amendments to the Planning Commission and to hold a public hearing which was completed on <br />October 6th. <br /> <br />Discussion of Ordinance Amendments <br /> <br />Staff has prepared draft ordinance language with amended and striking of language as shown in <br />red font for your review (Attachments A and B). The following are the sections and language <br />amendments proposed: <br /> <br />• Amending – 1320.06 District Requirements Chart: <br />o Front Yard Setback requirement from 20 feet to 50 feet <br />• Amending - 1325.05 Design Standards, Subd. 8, F.1.A: <br />o Fifty percent (50%) of all first level building façades that front a public street <br />shall be comprised of transparent windows or doors in order to allow views of <br />interior uses and activities. Transparency requirement may be waived by the City <br />where privacy concerns warrant. <br />• Striking - 1325.05 Design Standards, Subd. 8, F.1. B: <br />o Twenty percent (20%) of all other first level building facades that are reasonably <br />visible from the public right of way shall be comprised of window or door <br />openings. Simulated or opaque windows may be used on service areas. <br />• Striking - 1325.05, Subd. 8, M. Parking (1) (2): <br />o Placing parking between the street right-of-way and a building shall be <br />discouraged.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.