Laserfiche WebLink
Page 6 of 7 <br /> <br />• Planned Unit Development for performance standard flexibility (Applicant’s narrative <br />indicates a request for FAR and building height) <br /> <br />The table below provides the performance standards for the R-4 District, Shoreland Regulations <br />and the preliminary analysis for the proposed development: <br /> <br /> <br />R-4 District Standards <br /> <br />Shoreland District <br />Trident Development <br />Proposal <br />Minimum Lot Area per <br />Unit 3,630 s.f./unit <br /> <br />11,000 s.f./unit <br />Approximately 3,568 <br />s.f./125 unit <br />Maximum Building <br />Height 35 feet <br /> <br />35 feet <br />Approximate 39 feet – <br />43 feet <br />Maximum Floor Area <br />Ratio 0.3 <br /> <br />N/A 0.3645 <br />Maximum Structure <br />Coverage 25% of lot area <br /> <br />N/A 12.15% <br />Minimum Landscape <br />Lot Area 65% of lot area <br /> <br />65% of lot area <br />Not specified, but not <br />seeking flexibility <br />Maximum PUD Density 12 units/acre <br /> <br />N/A <br />11.19 units/acre (115) to <br />12.17 units/acre (125) <br />Minimum Front Yard <br />Setback 40 feet <br />Defaults to R-4 as <br />nonriparian lot Complies <br />Minimum Rear Yard <br />Setback 30 feet <br />Defaults to R-4 as <br />nonriparian lot Complies <br />Minimum Side Yard <br />Setback <br />5 feet (min)/15 feet <br />(total) <br />Defaults to R-4 as <br />nonriparian lot Complies <br />Off-Street Parking <br />1.1 stall/1 bedroom <br />2 stall/2+ bedroom <br />CUP 1 enclosed/unit <br /> <br /> <br />N/A <br />124 +/- enclosed <br />105 +/- surface <br />Flexibility would not be <br />requested <br /> <br />Stormwater & Wetlands <br />The Applicant has stated as part of the site grading that a stormwater retention pond will be <br />created on the south side of the proposed development. Additionally, they anticipate there may <br />be the need to construct an underground retention system due to space constraints of the site. At <br />this time, the Applicant has indicated no other details are known on the scope of this work, but as <br />the project progresses they will develop those engineered plans for the City Engineer to review. <br /> <br />As previously noted, the Concept Review submittal documents included a Wetland Delineation <br />Report. Similarly, to stormwater management, the Applicant has indicated they are working <br />through the logistics of the location of existing wetlands and impacts to placement of site <br />development. They’ve identified from the wetland delineation that the existing drainage/wetland <br />easements are no longer in alignment with actual wetlands. The Applicant recognizes that if they <br />decide to move forward with the project that existing easements will need to be vacated and new <br />easements shall be dedicated as part of the platting process. <br />