My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-13-23-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2023
>
02-13-23-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2023 11:04:21 AM
Creation date
2/13/2023 10:57:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
287
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — JANUARY 9, 2023 18 <br />this route. He anticipated if the second access point were not provided, the County would be going <br />through a condemnation process with Lindey's and the County would be paying a lot more to <br />resolve the issues on this property. <br />Mr. Mazzitello requested the Council approve the cooperative agreement this evening and again <br />asked if the Council was to table action on this matter that a special meeting be held prior to <br />January 23. <br />Mayor Grant commented on the importance of this intersection in Arden Hills. <br />Councilmember Holden stated she understood this was an important intersection in the City, but <br />noted she was still struggling with the fact the cost for this project had increased 80% in the past <br />two months. <br />Mr. Mazzitello described how the intersection project would be staged per the request of the City <br />and noted the east/west movement along County Road E would remain open throughout <br />construction. He noted there would be a four to six week closure for the north leg, followed by a <br />four to six week closure of the south leg. <br />Councilmember Fabel asked if the parking lot would have to be renovated and the access point <br />would be lost, even if the intersection were to remain a four-way stop. <br />Mr. Mazzitello reported this was the case. He explained the only way the access point could <br />remain is if the City were to do nothing to this intersection. <br />Mayor Grant questioned how the Council wanted to proceed. <br />Councilmember Rousseau stated this project would require the City to incur the right-of-way <br />costs and now was the opportune time to complete the project. <br />Mayor Grant explained this was the case, according to the County Engineer. <br />Councilmember Monson reported she was a bit more comfortable with this project, even with <br />the cost increases, knowing that the costs would be covered by MSA funding. <br />Councilmember Holden stated this was the case, but noted the increase in expenses would mean <br />MSA funding would not be available for other projects. She indicated it was her understanding the <br />Council was not making a determination on how to fund this project at this meeting, but rather <br />was being asked to approve a cooperative agreement with Ramsey County. <br />Councilmember Monson asked why the funding source would be a separate assumption or <br />consideration. <br />Councilmember Holden explained the funding sources within the staff memo were for <br />informational and budgeting purposes. She reported the Council would have to decide whether or <br />not MSA funding was used for this project. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.