My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
80-038
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
1980-1989
>
1980
>
80-038
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:07:22 PM
Creation date
11/13/2006 3:46:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />t <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />I'd like to present the report - assuming you have had <br />time to refer to it and review it, rather than go through it in <br />detail - to concentrate on those areas of concern.- traffic and <br />roadway treatment and costs which are also a concern. At <br />the end we'd be happy to answer any questions. <br /> <br />We looked primarily at the ,roadway at County Road E <br />from Trunk Highway 51 interchange to Lexington and found it's <br />working well. There have not been a large n1lIliberof accidents. <br />Twenty-eight accidents in 1979 which may seem like a high <br />number, but in proportion to the volume, it's low..' Sixteen occurred <br />at the west end near Highway 51 interchange, seven at Lexington, <br />which means only five accidents in between which means the road <br />is operating well now" <br /> <br />In getting this information from the county, we also talked <br />to the people in Traffic Operations and they have received <br />few complaints about the operation of the roadway ~ We also <br />obtained some volume information and found out the present <br />traffic volume in April of 1980 is 14,000 vehicles per day, almost <br />three times the volume of 1962 so it carries a high volume, and <br />looking at the delays and general operations (inaudible) of <br />the accidents, it operates well so our task is not to solve an <br />operating problem,. but to make sure we don't.make one.' <br /> <br />We looked at some <br />off ramp of Highway 51 <br />Pinetree Drive carries <br />direction, or close to <br /> <br />cross streets and found the northbound <br />carries 3000 vehicles a day and <br />1700 vehicles a day in the northbound <br />(inaudible) cars a day total. <br /> <br />We read some of the reports and found' out some of the <br />Committee's concerns, and they are basically speed, pedestrians, <br />vehicles (inaudible), aesthetics and expansion of the roadway, <br />and signs and poles, etc. <br /> <br />The speed limit is set by the Transportation Department. <br />'The city has no control over speed. All we can do is ask the <br />county to ask the state to revaluate the speed limits. We have <br />found the speed is close to posted speed limits and they will <br />probably not lower it. If they did, it probably wouldn't make a <br />great deal of change. The drivers are going to drive what they <br />feel is reasonable for them and the heck with the signs, so we <br />almost entirely neglected speeds because it's something we <br />probably can't control. <br /> <br />We looked at the vehicle problems at crossings and noted <br />that other than noon hour at McDonalds and the time when Mutual <br />Service lets out there's not much delay on approaches to the <br />roadway. The volume on Pinetree Drive (inaudible) program of <br />staggering working hours which allows the traffic to be spread <br />out which has a (inaudible) on the roadway. So we can handle <br />quite a volume of traffic without incurring more than a short <br />delay. The lines are increasing and there's quite a bi~ of <br />land available near MSI in the present driving range and <br />(inaudible) then we're going to have some problems of getting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.