Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION - JUNE 18, 2001 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Councilmembers were in agreement that City Administrator Lynch prepare a <br />specific agenda for the PMP W orksessions scheduled one hour before each <br />Council meeting, in order to allow Councilmembers to have a goal for each <br />meeting. <br /> <br />COMPREHENSIVE PARK PLAN <br /> <br />Discussion was held regarding public notice of the upcoming neighborhood <br />meetings to receive input on the park plan. <br /> <br />Staff was directed to mail individually addressed, first class letters to all City <br />residents within seven to ten days, informing them of the meetings, in addition to <br />the notice in the City newsletter, cable and website. <br /> <br />FIFTIETH ANNIVERSARYIDA Y IN THE PARK EVENT <br /> <br />Mr. Moore provided a summary and overview of the final details and logistics for <br />the Anniversary event. Mr. Moore informed Councilmembers that Ramsey <br />County would be unable to provide picnic tables at Tony Schmidt Park due to a <br />vendor problem. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst directed Mr. Moore to contact Greg Mack, informing him that <br />Mayor Probst would be contacting Ramsey County Commissioner, Tony Bennett, <br />for assistance in ensuring that the park would include picnic tables, the necessary <br />temporary repairs would be made in the one pavilion to make it useable for the <br />event, and any other needs to make the event successful. <br /> <br />EROSION SEDIMENT CONTROL ORDINANCE REVIEW <br /> <br />The Council requested further clarification regarding the format presented by staff <br />for their review of the proposed erosion sediment control ordinance. Discussion <br />items included page seven (variance section); page nine (which entity has final <br />jurisdiction); referencing the annual fee review, rather than using specific <br />numbers for fines and fees within the ordinance; and references to the "handbook" <br />without a copy being available for reference. <br /> <br />Staff was directed to provide a final draft of the ordinance, rather than a generic <br />version, by the June 25th Council meeting for review and further discussion, <br />anticipating formal action at the July 9th meeting. <br /> <br />RIGHT -OF -WAY ORDINANCE REVIEW <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The Council once again requested further clarification regarding the format <br />presented by staff for their review of the proposed right-of-way ordinance. <br />Discussion items included whether all changes had been incorporated (i.e., City <br />Attorney, former Planner); confirmation of the 12 month or 36 month restoration <br />