Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I- <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />. <br />I <br />. <br />.e <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />Ie <br />I <br /> <br />,ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL - TANUARY 9. 1995 <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone inquired if with these improvements, are previous flooding problems <br />on Valentine Drive addressed. Superintendent Winkel assured Council these issues will be <br />addressed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hicks inquired as to Minnesota State Aid funds. Mr. Stonehouse indicated if the <br />grade change provides a change in the water main, that portion can be funded by State Aid funds. <br /> <br />Mr. Maurer indicated funds that have been set aside for State Aid roadways should be used or <br />those funds will be eventually unavailable. Mr. Maurer suggested once the City has control of <br />the money it will be easier to access for projects. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst indicated concern that additional projects will also require the MSA funding, he <br />wished to move forward with caution regarding MSA funds. Mayor Probst identified various <br />other projects that perhaps would use these funds. <br /> <br />Mayor Probst inquired, regarding storm water problems, if the smaller pipe being replaced is the <br />main issue for the work. Mr. Maurer indicated the smaller pipe is one issue, but additional run <br />off is also the reasoning behind upsizing these improvements. <br /> <br />Councilmember Keirn questioned regarding the assessments to the residents, would the <br />assessment be 50% of the total value of the improvement, or 50% of the value of the improvement <br />after receiving funds from the County. Councilmember Malone indicated outside funds are not <br />included in the equation, and the assessment would be based on the total value of the <br />improvement of which 50% is typically assessed to the resident. However, no assessments have <br />been determined for this case, at this time. <br /> <br />MOTION: Hicks moved and Aplikowski seconded a motion to adopt Resolution #95-05; <br />Receiving the Feasibility Report and ordering a Public Hearing for February 27, <br />1995 at 7:30 p.m. in the matter of the County Road F Reconstruction <br />Improvement of 1995. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 95-06: ORDERING THE PRFPARATTON OF PLANS AND <br />SPECIFICATIONS IN THE MAlTER OF THE COUNTY ROAD F <br />RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT OF 1995. <br /> <br />MOTION: Hicks moved and Keim seconded a motion to adopt Resolution #95-06; Ordering <br />the preparation of plans and specifications in the matter of County Road F <br />Reconstruction Improvement of 1995. The motion carried unanimously (5-0). <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 95.07: ESTABLISHING COUNTY ROAD F AS A MINNESOTA <br />STATE Am STREET. <br />