CC 02-27-1995 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I I. I I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I Ie I ,ARDEN,HTT T _" CITY COUNCIL - FEBRUARY 27.1995 ~ Mr. Stenglein also inquired if it would be necessary for a petition for a name change of the road to a more appropriate residential street name, such as Valentine Drive. Mr. Stenglein inquired if copies of the transparencies used, were available. Mr. Stonehouse indicated copies could be obtained through the City offices. Mr. Ken Schacht of 1683 West County Road F, indicated concern for the trees on his property and inquired if the construction would be in the current right-of-way. Mr. Stonehouse indicated all construction would be within the current right-of-way, if trees are within the right-of-way, they would be removed for proper grading. Mr. Schacht also indicated a wish to change the name of the street, perhaps to ] ohn Farrell Drive. Mr. Schacht indicated concern for the traffic, he felt this issue should be addressed and perhaps the speed reduced. Mr. Schacht inquired if during construction, the residents would be able to reach their properties. Mr. Stonehouse indicated the contractor would provide a passable road, although inconvenient at times, this road would be only for residential traffic and not through traffic. Mr. Stonehouse also indicated construction would be done as quickly as possible. Mr. Walter Bieger of 1689 West County Road F, inquired as to the type of curb for the gutter would be used. Mr. Stonehouse indicated B618 would be used and as driveways were approached a curb cut would occur to match the drive. Mr.]erry Garski of 1795 West County Road F, urged the Council to reduce the speed on the road and address the traffic issues. Superintendent Winkel, for point of clarification stated, the State would have to do a traffic study and authorize a speed limit change, the City cannot do that. Mr. Ed Woo of 3988 Glenview Avenue, inquired if his property would be affected by the storm sewer. Mr. Stonehouse indicated the storm sewer would be along County Road F and would not affect Mr. Woo's property. Mr. Woo inquired as to the location of the walkway. Mr. Stonehouse pointed out the location on an overhead transparency and indicated the walkway would run on the south side of the road from the school to old Highway 10, within the public right-of-way. Mr. Woo inquired if the ditch on his property would be affected.