CC 02-28-1994 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I I .- I I I I I I Ie I I I I I I I -" I Arden Hills Council 3 February 28, 1994 noted that if any curb cut or access changes be considered by Council, the Planning Commission would recommend the plan as outlined on the diagram on Page 29 of the Lexington/Fox study dated 1990. Acting Mayor Probst asked whether the application from Roberts Development was currently pending, and if the Council would need to take action on the application? Fritsinger stated the Council previously tabled the request for the curb cut and they would need to take action on this application at some point. However, staff had not anticipated action to take place at this meeting. MOTION: Malone moved, seconded by Hicks to deny the request for a Site Plan Review/curb cut, Case #93-23 Scott W. Roberts/Roberts Development, 377l-87 North Lexington Avenue. Motion carried unanimously (4-0). Winiecki commented that the Planning Commission would appreciate if the Council would consider their request to direct staff to work on economic development issues such as designing a brochure promoting development in the City of Arden Hills. Council concurred that designing a brochure would be great, however, there is no funding set aside for any additional staff that might be needed to work on economic development projects, and if current staff was used, there would need to be reprioritization of staff's time before this could be considered. SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT APPEAL - ARDEN nEW TOWNBOME ASSOCIATION Mr. Winkel referred to the memo in the Council packet from Engineer Maurer and outlined the options to be considered. Council member Hicks commented that the staff had re- evaluated the Surface Water Management rate structure and the recommended modified charges seem reasonable. He further noted that the 2 (two) R-3 zoning districts located in the City are developed, and an actual rate based on density could be established. MOTION: Hicks moved, seconded by Aplikowski to approve Resolution #94-2l, amending the Surface Water Management utility rates for the R-3 developed townhomes in the City of Arden Hills. Discussion followed whether both the per acre cost and per unit cost should be noted in the resolution. City Accountant Terry Post stated that the opinion of Engineer Maurer was to indicate both costs for the record. The