Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />.- <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />Ie <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />.. <br />I <br /> <br />Arden Hills Council <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />February 28, 1994 <br /> <br />rate per unit was calculated on actual density based on <br />the two developed R-3 districts. If a new R-3 district <br />would be developed, staff would need the rate based on <br />acreage to enable them to calculate the per unit rate for <br />that development. Motion carried unanimously (4-0). <br /> <br />TCAAP SAN:ITARY SEWER CONNECTION TO <br />MOUNDS VIEW AND POSSIBLE APPROVAL OF <br />AGREEMENT BETWEEN ARDEN BILLS/MOUNDS VIEW/ <br />TCAAP. <br /> <br />Mr. Winkel referred to the memo provided in the Council <br />packet from Engineer Maurer. He commented that TCAAP is <br />in need of disposal of a lift station. This lift station <br />is a high maintenance item for them. There is an urgency <br />in their request as TCAAP has some funding available now <br />to proceed with the project. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone asked whether the project will <br />include construction in the area under Hwy. 35. Mr. <br />Winkel stated, yes in would include construction in this <br />area. Councilmember Malone commented that the City may <br />want to assume the cost differential to install a larger <br />pipe. The MWCC would assume the future responsibility of <br />the pipe no matter what size was installed if it was so <br />designated as an MWCC pipe. <br /> <br />Mr. Winkel noted that Engineer Maurer thought the MWCC <br />would pay for any future cost for a larger pipe. <br /> <br />Council member Hicks asked what the life expectancy of a <br />pipe would be. He further noted that the future of this <br />area is unknown and could remain unknown for many years. <br />Councilmember Aplikowski concurred. <br /> <br />Councilmember Malone asked whether the Engineer had a <br />cost comparison on the various sizes of pipes, and if the <br />bid request could include an alternate bid for a larger <br />pipe to be installed. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Probst moved, seconded by Malone to allow the <br />agreement process to proceed, however, that some <br />additional action be taken that would direct staff <br />to pursue interseptor designation for that <br />connection, and that the bid process include an <br />alternate pipe size for the maximum size the lift <br />station can accommodate. Motion carried unanimously <br />(4-0) . <br />