Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />.e <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />Ie <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />~ <br />I <br /> <br />Arden Hills Council <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />February 28, 1994 <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATrON TO APPROVE <br />STREET AND STOP srGN POLrcy <br />FROM THE PUBLrc WORKS/SAFETY COMMrTTEE <br /> <br />Mr. Winkel stated that the Public Works/Safety Committee <br />drafted a street/stop sign policy for the Council to <br />review. He introduced Dick Roessler, the Chairperson of <br />the Public Works/Safety Committee. Mr. Roessler <br />addressed the Council and outlined the contents of the <br />proposed policy. A copy of the Committee's proposed <br />policy was included in the Council packets. The policy <br />would include the installation or the removal of a <br />street/stop sign. <br /> <br />Administrator Person noted that the Council had before <br />them a draft copy of staff's recommended policy. It was <br />noted that Item #I, "Conditions", remains the same as the <br />Committee had recommended. Under Item II, Procedures, <br />various changes were made. The time frame for making a <br />recommendation to Council was deleted and polling the <br />affected residences/businesses was deleted. Item II, C <br />was deleted in its entirety. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hicks noted that polling is important, <br />however, the public is invited to attend the Public <br />Works/Safety Committee meetings at which time comments <br />can be made. <br /> <br />Councilmember Aplikowski stated that feedback from the <br />residents is important, as well as, community <br />notification. She further commented that there should be <br />a time limit set for notifying the concerned party of the <br />decision. <br /> <br />(Mayor Sather arrived at 8:30 pm, and presided over the <br />remainder of the meeting). <br /> <br />Administrator Person noted that this is <br />and not to be based on popular support. <br />asked if the Committee would approve of <br />polling issue from the proposed policy. <br />stated that would be acceptable. <br /> <br />a safety issue, <br />Mr. Roessler was <br />removing the <br />Mr. Roessler <br /> <br />Councilmember Probst stated that polling is a cumbersome <br />procedure, and perhaps the Committee members could poll <br />the affected parties, and offer guidance to them. Mr. <br />Roessler stated that this would be an appropriate <br />procedure. <br />