My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC 09-12-1988
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
CC 09-12-1988
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2007 1:07:47 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 2:39:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General (2)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, September 12, 1988 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />CASSERLY (Cont'd) <br /> <br />Casserly outlined Tax Increment Financing history, how it <br />works, problems and the city role in development process. <br /> <br />The Financial Consultant explained some concepts relative to TIF: <br /> <br />-People approach tax increment as an assistance to a user/developer; the only <br />reason for involvement in tax increment financing should be due to municipal 4If <br />goals or objectives to be achieved. TIF is a planning device and a tool for <br />development. <br />-Tax Increment is a source of funding to provide for development/redevelopment <br />for cities. <br />-Tax Increment Was originally designed to assist mature or substantially <br />developed cities fill out available land or redevelop underutilized/blighted <br />areas and encourage a higher density of development. <br /> <br />Mary Molzahn displayed tables that identified how TIF is generated; Cash Flow with <br />traditional bond sale and the "Pay As You Go" plan with limited revenue tax <br />increment notes. She explained the major differences between the two plans and <br />noted the "pay as you go" plan reduces the risks to the City. <br /> <br />Casserly reviewed problems that could be incurred and specifically problema <br />relating to the Round Lake study area. He explained some alternatives for working <br />through the problems and services he could provide: <br /> <br />-Set up a development program, explore State Statutes that would be <br />applicable. <br />-Design a "Master Plan"; create multiple tax increment districts in the <br />same area on a parcel by parcel basis. <br />-Develop each parcel on its own merits and the project could support each <br />other. <br />-Prepare a development agreement; what the City is requesting and what it <br />is willing to offer as incentive to the developer. <br />-Minimal issuance of General Obligation Bonds. <br />-Explore other public financing opportunities; special assessments or joint <br />powers opportunities. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Casserly stated he does not offer financial consulting in the conventional sense, <br />they are not paid from the issuance of bonds, the services are paid at an hourly <br />rate. He explained they have no incentive for the City to go into debt; the <br />objective is to accomplish the goal with maximum security_and financial <br />creativity. Casserly praised the Land Study report that was prepared by the Task <br />Force relative to the site. <br /> <br />Council questioned the feaSibility of this project being successful. <br /> <br />Casserly stated it was clear from the study report the Round Lake area project <br />would be very feasible and the projected figures would work as outlined; he <br />explained he could not guarantee when or if the development would begin. <br /> <br />There was Council discussion relative to proceeding with the project as follows: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />-Review other financial consultants proposals. <br />-Prepare and set a clear policy for proceeding with the project. <br />-Development of a zoning district. <br />-Extent of developer interest in the site. <br />-Imposing a moratorium on development in the area until the zoning district <br />has been determined. <br />-Informing property owners in the area of the plans for the project. <br /> <br />Clerk Administrator Berger advised that the staff, Task Force and Planning Commission <br />dp not have the expertise to work with the legalities and other aspects of the <br />project; he recommended a financial consultant be retained to begin putting the <br />plan in action. <br /> <br />Task Force Committee members Probst and Malone agreed there would be a demand for <br />development at the site. Probst commented he could not guarantee the precise mix <br />of uses and the valuation predicted for the site, however in his opinion there <br />would be activity on the site once Arden Hills declares a policy for development <br />of the site; what the City is willing to offer as incentive for development. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.