Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Minutes of the Arden Hills Regular Council Meeting, May 31, 1988 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />WATER TOWER (Cont'd) Lund advised it would be better at this time to determine <br />how the system operates prior to installation of the <br />altitude valve. He pointed out it was not necessary to install the valve at this <br />time; he indicated the best time for installation would be in 5 years, at the <br />time Roseville does routine maintenance on their tower and it is shut down. Lund <br />noted that during that time epan Arden Hills could gather data sbout how the new <br />water tower functions and what is happening in the water system. He also pointed <br />out it would allow time for the City to formulate a decision as to how the tower <br />should operate. <br /> <br />Mayor Woodburn questioned how the Arden Hills water system was functioning at <br />this time. <br /> <br />Public Works Supervisor Raddatz advised the new tower has helped decrease the <br />time the pumping station operates and reduces the time necessary to fill the old <br />tower. Raddatz pointed out that without the controls installed in the new tower <br />it is impossible to determine the water level. <br /> <br />Councilmember Winiecki questioned if the old water tower in Arden Hills operates <br />at full capacity and how the old tower would be affected by moving the controls <br />to the new tower. <br /> <br />Lund explained the old tower can fill to capacity, however, he was unsure at what <br />level it currently operates. He stated the movement of the controls to the new <br />tower would not affect the operation of the old tower. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Will Liebenow advised that Roseville. and some other communities, do not utilize <br />their water towers at full capacity. It is his understanding the operators prefer <br />to have a "cushion" area at the top of the tank. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hansen said that this type of explanation should have been provided <br />prior to the purchase of the water tower. She also questioned why a million <br />gallon water tower was purchased if the system is working without the tank at <br />full capacity. Hansen further questioned if the placement of the altitude valve <br />at the Roseville tower would alleviate the problem, or if problems would surface <br />again in the future at which time a recommendation may be made to install a <br />booster station at Hamline Avenue. <br /> <br />t <br /> <br />Lund stated that it was unfortunate the communication breakdown occurred over the <br />years the water tower was discussed. He explained the recommendation for the one <br />million gallon water tower was based on population projections, and, at the time <br />the recommendation was made Arden Hills was not fully developed. Lund advised <br />that the altitude valve should alleviate the problem of the tank not filling to <br />capacity and it would be the least costly solution, since the valve has little or <br />no operating expense connected with it. He explained that when the City of <br />Roseville completes its pumping test, which simulate having an altitude valve in <br />the system, he will be better able to assess the operation of the new water tower <br />in Arden Hills. Lund noted the test may show that the tower is serving its <br />purpose at this time, and that it may not be necessary for Arden Hills to spend <br />the money to install the valve at this time. <br /> <br />Council discussed the fact that the water tower recommendation was based on an <br />estimated population of 11,000; questioned if the tower would serve that <br />population estimate if the tank operate a at full capacity. It was noted that the <br />water tower will serve that only if more money is spent to bring the level to <br />full capacity. <br /> <br />Liebenow pointed out that with the installation of the altitude valve the amount <br />of money ultimately spent will not exceed what was provided in the feasibility <br />report. He stated that although the altitude valve was not mentioned in detail in <br />the feasibility report, neither is security lighting. overhead doors, connecting <br />watermain, etc. The report estimated the elevated tank cost at approximately <br />$800,000.00, and the bids were below that figure. Liebenow stated with the <br />additional $5,000 for controls and $35.000 for the altitude valve, the cost is <br />still below the original amount the feasibility report mentioned. <br /> <br />Councilmember Peck questioned if Roseville was aware of our intent to place the <br />altitude valve at their water tower and if would they be agreeable to the <br />installation. <br /> <br />. <br />