|
<br /> Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting, August 10, 1987
<br /> Page ~ ':> '
<br /> ASSMT. HRING Moved by Peck, seconded by Winiecki, that Council deny
<br /> . HAMLINE (Cont'd) Resolution No. 87-47, CALLING FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED
<br /> ASSESSMENT OF IMPROVEMENT NO. P-85-3, HAMLINE AVE.
<br /> (PHASE I AND PHASEII), and, furthermore, that the assessment costs be paid by
<br /> the City from the PIR funds available.
<br /> Moved by Hansen, seconded by Peck, that Council amend
<br /> the motion by deletion of the following verbage: "and, furthermore, that the
<br /> assessment costs be paid by the City from the PIR funds available". Amendment
<br /> to motion carried unanimously. (4-0)
<br /> Original motion as amended carried unanimously. (4-0)
<br /> PAVEMENT MGMT STUDY Council was advised by Engineer Peters that the
<br /> Pavement Management Study would be completed in one
<br /> week and questioned if Council would like to have a workshop session to discuss
<br /> establishing an assessment policy for street reconstruction.
<br /> There was discussion relative to referring this matter to the Finance Committee
<br /> for their review and recommendation for establishing an assessment policy.
<br /> After discussion, Council concurred that they would prefer to study the
<br /> assessment policy issue with full Council, after review of the Pavement ,I
<br /> \ Management Study. '):::(:4J;cl.", l).., (),J" .~, ': U-{);\" Q i <if, ,.U ~ ".,'(, 'I
<br /> , '1 ()f5o. tJ,,/I."--i-J,i,.\ J.4
<br /> 0._ U).:";;.t-....~,t;-.tl ~Q...:l,.~ ._.It..o;',___ ~4,",G\.~}C.j. )).,0
<br /> REPORT OF PLANNER
<br /> . CASE #87-25; PKING. Council was referred to Planner's report of 7/13/87 and
<br /> LOT EXPANSION, MSI Planning Commission minutes (8-5-87) recommending
<br /> INS., 2 PINE TREE approval of the amended site plan for parking lot
<br /> expansion with conditions.
<br /> A representative of MSI Insurance presented a landscape plan which intensified
<br /> the plantings in the parking lot area, as recommended by Planning Commission in
<br /> their minutes of 8/5/87.
<br /> Councilmember Peck referred to the letter from MSI, dated 8-6-87, relative to
<br /> permission for employees to park on Pine Tree during the contruction period of
<br /> 3-5 weeks; he questioned if the street width would accommodate emergency
<br /> vehicles if the employees were parked on both sides of Pine Tree Drive.
<br /> Council discussed referral of the parking matter to the Ramsey County Sheriff's
<br /> Office and the Fire Chief so they could determine the impact of the vehicles
<br /> parking on Pine Tree Drive.
<br /> Winiecki questioned if the applicant had explored the option of the employees
<br /> parking along the entrance road to the parking lot area; she also questioned if
<br /> the ponding area would be disturbed by the construction." "
<br /> 1''1'" '
<br /> 'i~""'1... _,"vj-.;.!"-O
<br /> .//The applicant advised they would explore the suggestion'f C~uncilmember'
<br /> / Winiecki,
<br /> . Planner Hiller stated that the ponding area would not be disturbed; there will
<br /> be a relatively small amount of additional drainage and the applicant advised a
<br /> safety factor has been built in and would not require enlargement of the ponds.
<br /> Moved by Hansen, seconded by Peck, that Council approve
<br /> Case #87-25, Amended Site Plan Review for Parking Lot Expansion for 152 parking
<br /> spaces, at Two Pine Tree Drive, MSI Insurance, contingent upon the following:
<br /> a. Regrading of berms as indicated on grading plan.
<br /> b. Relocation or replacement of all disturbed plant materials.
<br /> c. Placement of plant materials at the west corner of the parking lot, as
<br /> per plan submitted this evening.
<br /> Moved by Peck, seconded by Hansen, that the motion be
<br /> .SJ amended to include that the problem of MSI employees parking on the street
<br /> <luring construction be referred to the Ramsey County Sheriff's Office and the
<br /> Fire Chief for their review and recommendation.
<br /> In discussion, Winiecki questioned if the intent of the motion included MSI's
<br /> parking and private road as well as Pine Tree Drive. Peck stated his intent was
<br /> for Pine Tree Drive only.
<br /> -
<br />
|