Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Minutes <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />of the RegUla~ouncil Meeting, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />June 8, 1987 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />LIGHTING (Cont'd) Miller stated that Lien was planning to contact his <br />consultants relative to refocasing the existing lights <br />and ordering screens for the lights to reduce the spread of the lighting. He <br />further advised that Lien stated the light shields are being shipped; he <br />explained that he would like to have an opportunity to evaluate the lighting <br />for compliance with the zoning code when the shields are in place, during the <br />evening hours. When this is accomplished, Miller will report back to Council. <br /> <br />REPORT OF PARKS DIRECTOR <br /> <br />PROB. COMPLETION <br />KEVIN FULLER <br /> <br />Council was referred to Buckley's memorandum (6/3/87) <br />regarding Kevin Fuller's completion of his probationary <br />period and recommending a salary increases. <br /> <br />Buckley stated the Kevin has been an excellent employee and will satisfactorily <br />'complete his probationary period on June 30th. He recommended a $.50 per hour <br />increase at this time and continued $.50 per hour increases at six month <br />intervals until Kevin's salary is equal with other Parks employees. Parks <br />Director advised this it would take approximately 2 years to accomplish the <br />salary equity and that each six month increase would be reviewed by Council. <br /> <br />Sather moved, seconded by Winiecki, that Council <br />approve the full-time employee status of Kevin Fuller upon completion of his <br />probationary period on June 30, 1987, and authorize a salary increase as <br />outlined by Parks Director John Buckley in his memorandum of 6-3-87. Motion <br />carried unanimously. (5-0) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />PURCH. OF PARKS <br />ONE-TON TRUCK <br /> <br />The Public Works Supervisor reviewed the information <br />he had discussed at the last Council meeting relative <br />to the bid received on this vehicle. <br /> <br />Raddatz stated that he polled the dealers to whom bids had been sent and <br />reported that this is the time of the year when model changes occur; dealers <br />are hesitant to submit a bid on the 1988 models since firm prices are not <br />known. It was Raddatz's opinion that re-bidding would not be beneficial and he <br />recommended accepting the bid from Minar Ford for the 1988 Truck at a cost of <br />$13,995.00. <br /> <br />Raddatz advised Council that he and the Parks Director had discussed the <br />purchase of a 1986 Truck that was on the car lot, owned by GMC, however GMC was <br />not willing to lower the price of the vehicle. He stated that the new 1988 <br />truck could be purchased for approximately the same price as the 1986 truck. <br /> <br />Council questioned if the box and plow would be bid separately. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Raddatz stated they would. <br /> <br />Moved by Hansen, seconded by Sather, that Council <br />approve the purchase of a one-ton truck for the Parks Department from Minar <br />Ford, at a cost of $13,995.00. <br /> <br />In discussion, Council questioned if Raddatz would trade in the old truck at a <br />value of $5,000.00 or sell it outright. Raddatz stated the old truck is in <br />good condition and it was his opinion that selling it outright may be more <br />profitable. <br /> <br />Motion carried unanimously. (5-0) <br /> <br />RES. #87-29: INCR. <br />BLDG. PERMIT FEES <br /> <br />Council was referred to Finance Committee minutes of <br />May 28th, recommending an increase in Building Permit <br />Fees. <br /> <br />Mayor Woodburn discussed information he had compiled relative to current fees <br />and projected income with the increase. He stated the increase for an average <br />building permit for single family homes would be two and one-half times greater <br />than the current fee. He questioned if the 65% surcharge. for plan review is in <br />addition to the building permit fee increase. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Clerk Administrator Morrison stated the 65% plan check fee would be an <br />additional charge; she advised she had contacted other communities (Roseville <br />and Shoreview) and found that even though the surcharge is mandated by State <br />law, they do not charge residential homes that fee. Morrison advised that the <br />State has not, to date, taken any action against these communities. <br /> <br />Morrison commented that the Building Inspector recommended Council adopt the <br />1985 Building Permit fee schedule and charge the 65% surcharge only on <br />Commercial and Industrial permit applications. <br />